PDA

View Full Version : John Simmonds


Colin Roberts
05-28-2010, 06:23 PM
From the texts of two 'Private Messages', recently received, from Jon Simons:

We might get a book out of John Simmonds yet!

I noticed this in The Star 12th Oct 88:

'A Suspicious Infirmary Patient'

"A report was current late last night that the police suspect a man who is at present a patient in an East-end infirmary. He has been admitted since the commission of the last murder. Owing to his suspicious behavior their attention was directed to him. Detectives are making inquiries, and he is kept under surveillance."(My Emphasis/Color-Shading)

and ...

… the press account of the suspicious infirmary patient also appears, word for word, in the London Evening News 12th Oct.

I should begin, by acknowledging that I am extremely skeptical of unsubstantiated tabloid assertions, regarding "Jolly Bonnet"(s), imminent victims who believed that they knew the identity of the 'Whitechapel Murderer', witnesses who were "discredited", etc ...

Again; I am extremely skeptical of unsubstantiated tabloid assertions.

---------

Moving right along, ...

"We might get a book out of John Simmonds yet!"

Who, exactly, is "John Simmonds"?

He was first brought to our attention, back in December, ...

... there was an interesting chappy called John Simmonds, who was a 22 yr old hawker who lived at 60 Wentworth St, and he was admitted to the Whitechapel Infirmary a week after the double event suffering from syphilis, and was discharged on Nov 8th!!

... by Jon Simons, a.k.a. 'Jon Guy'.

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4027/4648017016_6faa8838fb.jpg (http://www.movinghere.org.uk/deliveryfiles/LMA/STBG_WH_123_020/0/16.pdf)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4017/4648017006_87506cec51.jpg (http://www.movinghere.org.uk/deliveryfiles/LMA/STBG_WH_123_020/0/16.pdf)

--- Click Either of the Above Images, Select Frame '3', and Scroll to Line '3288'; to View the Register (.pdf), in the "Moving Here Catalogue": movinghere.org.uk ---

Date: "Tuesday, Oct 9th"
Name: "Simmonds, John"
Age: "22"
Where Admitted From: "60 Wentworth St"
Calling: "Hawker"
Cause of Admission: "Syphilis"
Religion: "Ch of E"
Settlement: "5 Months" *
Date of Discharge: "5-11-88" (Possibly "8-11-88")

* Self-Proclaimed residence, of five months, in the Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3964025786_2508282244.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/3964025786/sizes/l/)
Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union - 1888 (Click Image, to Enlarge in flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/3964025786/sizes/l/))
Underlying Aerial Imagery: Copyright Google Earth, 2007
Overlying Plots, Labels and Color-Shadings: Copyright Colin C. Roberts, 2010

Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Liberty of Norton Folgate (Green): 1,449
- The Old Artillery Ground (Aqua): 2,138
- The Parish of Christ Church Spitalfields (Blue): 22,859
- The Hamlet of Mile End New Town (Orange): 11,303
- The Parish of Holy Trinity ('Minories') (Yellow): 301
- The Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel (Red): 32,326
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 32,284}
----- {Portion within the City of London, -1900: 42}
- The Liberty of Her Majesty's Tower of London (Orange): 933
----- {The Liberty of the Tower: n/a}
----- {The Precinct of Old Tower Without: 65}
----- {The Tower: 868}
- The Precinct of St. Katharine (Blue): 182
- The Parish of St. Botolph without Aldgate (Green): 2,971
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 2,971}

The portion of the Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel (42) that was situated within the Municipality of the City of London, was a component of the Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union; until becoming a part of the Parish of St. Botolph without Aldgate, City of London, in 1900; and accordingly being included within the Registration / Poor Law administration of the City of London.

- Total Population - Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 74,462

---------

I have managed to locate two 'potentially likely' matches, in the records of the Census of England & Wales, 1881 & 1891:

Census of England & Wales, 1881:
Registration District: St. George in the East
Civil Parish: St. George in the East
Registration Sub-District: St. Mary
Enumeration District: 2
Page: 37
"12 Denmark Street"
"John Simmonds"
"15"
"Scholar"
"Middx / London"

---

Census of England & Wales, 1891:
Registration District: Whitechapel
Civil Parish: Christ Church Spitalfields
Registration Sub-District: Spitalfields
Enumeration District: 5
Page: 40
"55 Flower & Dean Street"
"John Simmonds"
"30"
"Orange Porter"
"Hackney"

I have also managed to locate a likely reference to the latter of the two 'potentially likely' matches, in the Register of Deaths, Whitechapel Union Infirmary, 1900:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4068/4632321083_bf780eb1cf.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4632321083/sizes/o/)
Register of Deaths: Whitechapel Union Infirmary, 1900 (Click Image, to Enlarge in flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4632321083/sizes/o/))

Date of Death: "September 16th, 1900"
Name: "Simmonds, John"
Age: "40"
Cause of Death: "Inquest"

---

A Geographic Profiler's 'dream-come-true'!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2691/4181872776_de2d4867fa.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4181872776/sizes/l/)
60 Wentworth Street, Parish of Christ Church Spitalfields / George Yard Buildings, George Yard, Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel (Click Image, to Enlarge in flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4181872776/sizes/l/))
Underlying Aerial Imagery: Copyright Google Earth, 2007
Overlying Plots, Labels and Color-Shadings: Copyright Colin C. Roberts, 2010

Green: 60 Wentworth Street, Parish of Christ Church Spitalfields
Red: George Yard Buildings, George Yard, Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel
Green Dot: Murder-Site Mean-Center, i.e. Murder-Site Center of Mass ('MacNaghten-Five' + Tabram)
Southwest Corner of the Intersection of Wentworth Street and Osborn Street, Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel, County of Middlesex
Longitude: 0° 4' 14.18" West
Latitude: 51° 31' 2.06" North

The plotted location of the Tabram murder-site, in this instance, assumes that the body was discovered at the top of the first full flight of stairs, on the first-floor outdoor balcony, of George Yard Buildings.

Having considered some keen observations and detailed illustrations, that were contributed to some recent discussion, on Casebook.org; I have accepted the notion that Tabram's body was, in all likelihood, discovered on an interior 'half-floor' landing, between the ground-floor and first-floor levels.

The plotted location of the Tabram murder-site, therefore, should be shifted approximately eight-to-twelve feet (ground-level) east/northeast, along a vector that is perpendicular to the frontage of George Yard Buildings.


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2663/4195549771_3a3f6dfa28.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4195549771/sizes/l/)
Deviations from Murder-Site Mean-Center (Elliptical Perspective) (Click Image, to Enlarge in flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4195549771/sizes/l/))
Underlying Aerial Imagery: Copyright Google Earth, 2007
Overlying Plots, Labels and Color-Shadings: Copyright Colin C. Roberts, 2010

From the outside, in …

- Robert Mann (Modern-Day Person of Interest): Whitechapel Union Infirmary, Baker's Row, Hamlet of Mile End New Town, County of Middlesex
Longitude: 0° 3' 50.14" West
Latitude: 51° 31' 14.66" North

My Geographic Profile Model would suggest that the documented 1888 residence of Robert Mann (i.e. the Whitechapel Union Infirmary) should be perceived as having fallen within the 70th percentile (i.e. the top 30.00%) of the distribution of probability, regarding the location of the perpetrator's base of operations.

- Robert Mann (Modern-Day Person of Interest): Whitechapel Union Infirmary Mortuary, Eagle Place, Old Montague Street, Hamlet of Mile End New Town, County of Middlesex
Longitude: 0° 3' 52.22" West
Latitude: 51° 31' 8.12" North

My Geographic Profile Model would suggest that the documented 1888 workplace of Robert Mann (i.e. the Whitechapel Union Infirmary Mortuary) should be perceived as having fallen within the 76th percentile (i.e. the top 23.54%) of the distribution of probability, regarding the location of the perpetrator's base of operations.

- Aaron Kosminski (Contemporary Suspect): 34 Yalford Street, Hamlet of Mile End Old Town, County of Middlesex
Longitude: 0° 3' 56.79" West
Latitude: 51° 30' 59.31" North

My Geographic Profile Model would suggest that the probable 1888 residence of Aaron Kosminski (i.e. 34 Yalford Street) should be perceived as having fallen within the 78th percentile (i.e. the top 21.76%) of the distribution of probability, regarding the location of the perpetrator's base of operations.

- George Hutchinson & Joseph Fleming (aka 'James Evans') (Modern-Day Persons of Interest): Victoria Home for Working Men, 39-41 Commercial Street, Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel, County of Middlesex
Longitude: 0° 4' 23.98" West
Latitude: 51° 31' 0.64" North

My Geographic Profile Model would suggest that the self-stated 1888 residence of George Hutchinson / the self-stated 1889 residence of Joseph Fleming (aka 'James Evans') (i.e. the Victoria Home for Working Men) should be perceived as having fallen within the 89th percentile (i.e. the top 10.52%) of the distribution of probability, regarding the location of the perpetrator's base of operations.

- John Simmonds (Modern-Day Person of Interest): 60 Wentworth Street, Parish of Christ Church Spitalfields, County of Middlesex
Longitude: 0° 4' 18.56" West
Latitude: 51° 31' 1.75" North

My Geographic Profile Model would suggest that the self-stated 1888 residence of John Simmonds (i.e. 60 Wentworth Street) should be perceived as having fallen within the 95th percentile (i.e. the top 4.96%) of the distribution of probability, regarding the location of the perpetrator's base of operations.

---------

In a 'nutshell' ...

- Robert Mann (Whitechapel Union Infirmary): 70th Percentile

- Robert Mann (Whitechapel Union Infirmary Mortuary): 76th Percentile

- Aaron Kosminski (34 Yalford Street): 78th Percentile

- George Hutchinson & Joseph Fleming (aka 'James Evans') (Victoria Home for Working Men): 89th Percentile

- John Simmonds (60 Wentworth Street): 95th Percentile

---------

Again;

... in The Star 12th Oct 88:

'A Suspicious Infirmary Patient'

"A report was current late last night that the police suspect a man who is at present a patient in an East-end infirmary. He has been admitted since the commission of the last murder. Owing to his suspicious behavior their attention was directed to him. Detectives are making inquiries, and he is kept under surveillance."(My Emphasis/Color-Shading)

"... a man who is at present a patient in an East-end infirmary."

So; just what is the likelihood that this "patient in an East-end infirmary"* and John Simmonds were one and the same?

* Assuming, of course, that he even existed.

I will begin to address that issue, by considering the number of males that were enumerated as 'inmates'/'patients', of the Poor Law Infirmaries that were situated within London's 'East End', in accordance with the Census of England & Wales, 1891.

Holborn Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Combined Parish of St. Andrew Holborn ('Above the Bars') & St. George the Martyr: 26,228
----- {Portion of the Parish of St. Andrew Holborn within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: n/k}
----- {The Parish of St. George the Martyr: n/k}
- Gray's Inn: 253
- Furnival's Inn: 121
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 97}
----- {Portion within the City of London: 24}
- Lincoln's Inn: 27
- Staple Inn: 21
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 18}
----- {Portion within the City of London: 3}
- The Liberty of Saffron Hill, Hatton Garden, Ely Rents and Ely Place: 4,506
- The Combined Parish of St. James & St. John Clerkenwell: 66,216
----- {The Parish of St. James Clerkenwell: n/k}
----- {The Parish of St. John Clerkenwell: n/k}
- The Parish of St. Sepulchre ('without Newgate'): 1,972
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 1,972}
- The Charter House: 136
- The Parish of St. Luke: 42,440

The Combined Parish of St. James & St. John Clerkenwell included a portion of the settlement of Pentonville; and, the Parish of St. Luke included a portion of the settlement of Finsbury, as well as a very minor portion of the settlement of Hoxton.

- Total Population - Holborn Registration District (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 141,920

Gray's Inn (253) and Lincoln's Inn (27) were both components of the Holborn Registration District (141,920); but, neither was a component of any Poor Law Union.

- Total Population - Holborn Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 141,640

___ Holborn Union Infirmary, Shepherdess Walk, Parish of St. Leonard Shoreditch (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 495
- Female: 618
- Total: 1,113

---

City of London Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Municipality of the City of London: 37,705
----- {All Constituent Parochial and Extra-Parochial Entities, Included Herein: 37,705}
- The Liberty of Glasshouse Yard: 779

The Liberty of Glasshouse Yard (779), which originally constituted the portion of the Parish of St. Botolph without Aldersgate, that was situated within the County of Middlesex (i.e. outside the City of London), was included within the Registration / Poor Law administration of the City of London.

The Middle Temple (95), along with those portions of Furnival's Inn (24), Staple Inn (3), and the Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel (42), which were situated within the Municipality of the City of London (37,705), were not included within the Registration / Poor Law administration of the City of London.

- Total Population - City of London Registration District (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 38,320

The Inner Temple (96) was a component of the City of London Registration District (38,320); but, was not a component of any Poor Law Union.

- Total Population - City of London Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 38,224

___ City of London Union Infirmary, Bow Road, Parish of Bromley St. Leonard (Census of England & Wales, 1891):

----- {Portion Situated within the Hamlet of Mile End Old Town; Enumerated Accordingly: 253}
- Male: 82
- Female: 171
- Total: 253

----- {Portion Situated within the Parish of Bromley St. Leonard; Enumerated Accordingly: 317}
- Male: 210
- Female: 107
- Total: 317

___ Entire Facility (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 292
- Female: 278
- Total: 570

---

Shoreditch Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. Leonard Shoreditch: 124,009

The Parish of St. Leonard Shoreditch included the settlements of Hoxton, Holywell and Haggerston, as well as a portion of the settlement of Finsbury.

- Total Population - St. Leonard Shoreditch Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 124,009

___ Shoreditch Infirmary, Kingsland Road, Parish of St. Leonard Shoreditch (located on the grounds of the Parish Workhouse of St. Leonard Shoreditch) (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 253
- Female: 231
- Total: 484

---

Bethnal Green Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. Matthew Bethnal Green: 129,132

The Parish of St. Matthew Bethnal Green included a portion of the settlement of Globe Town.

- Total Population - St. Matthew Bethnal Green Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 129,132

___ Bethnal Green Workhouse, Waterloo Road, Parish of St. Matthew Bethnal Green* (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 340
- Female: 312
- Total: 652

* The Census of England & Wales, 1891, does not make reference to a distinct infirmary facility, of affiliation with the Bethnal Green Poor Law Parish. It does, however, list each inmate of the Parish Workhouse of St. Matthew Bethnal Green, as being one of the following: "Sick Inmate"; "Infirm Inmate"; "Nursery Inmate"; "Inmate". Those described as being either 'sick', or 'infirm', have been included in this tabulation.

---

Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Liberty of Norton Folgate: 1,449
- The Old Artillery Ground: 2,138
- The Parish of Christ Church Spitalfields: 22,859
- The Hamlet of Mile End New Town: 11,303
- The Parish of Holy Trinity ('Minories'): 301
- The Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel: 32,326
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 32,284}
----- {Portion within the City of London, -1900: 42}
- The Liberty of Her Majesty's Tower of London: 933
----- {The Liberty of the Tower: n/a}
----- {The Precinct of Old Tower Without: 65}
----- {The Tower: 868}
- The Precinct of St. Katharine: 182
- The Parish of St. Botolph without Aldgate: 2,971
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 2,971}

The portion of the Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel (42) that was situated within the Municipality of the City of London, was a component of the Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union; until becoming a part of the Parish of St. Botolph without Aldgate, City of London, in 1900; and accordingly being included within the Registration / Poor Law administration of the City of London.

- Total Population - Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 74,462

___ Whitechapel Union Infirmary, Baker's Row, Hamlet of Mile End New Town (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 362
- Female: 237
- Total: 599

---

Mile End Old Town Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Hamlet of Mile End Old Town: 107,592

The Hamlet of Mile End Old Town included portions of the settlements of Globe Town, Stepney and Bow Common.

- Total Population - Mile End Old Town Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 107,592

___ Mile End Old Town Infirmary, Bancroft Road, Hamlet of Mile End Old Town (located on the grounds of the Parish Workhouse of Mile End Old Town) (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 207
- Female: 231
- Total: 438

---

St. George in the East Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. George in the East: 45,795

- Total Population - St. George in the East Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 45,795

___ St. George in the East Infirmary, Raine Street, Parish of St. George in the East (located on the grounds of the Parish Workhouse of St. George in the East) (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 179
- Female: 202
- Total: 381

---

Stepney Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. John of Wapping: 2,123
- The Parish of St. Paul Shadwell: 8,123
- The Hamlet of Ratcliff: 14,928
- The Parish of St. Anne Limehouse: 32,202

The Hamlet of Ratcliff included a portion of the settlement of Stepney.

- Total Population - Stepney Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 57,376

Poplar Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. Mary Stratford Bow: 40,365
- The Parish of Bromley St. Leonard: 70,000
- The Parish of All Saints Poplar: 56,383

The Parish of St. Mary Stratford Bow included the settlement of Old Ford; the Parish of Bromley St. Leonard included a portion of the settlement of Bow Common; and, the Parish of All Saints Poplar included the settlements of Millwall, Cubitt Town and Blackwall.

- Total Population - Poplar Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 166,748

___ Poplar & Stepney Sick Asylum, Devon's Road, Parish of Bromley St. Leonard: A Poor Law infirmary, shared by the Poor Law Unions of Poplar and Stepney (Poplar & Stepney Sick Asylum District: 224,124) (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 302
- Female: 269
- Total: 571

___ Poplar Union Infirmary, North Street, Parish of All Saints Poplar (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 44
- Female: 0
- Total: 44

---

All Poor Law Infirmaries, Located within London's 'East End' (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- Male: 2,474
- Female: 2,378
- Total: 4,852

The total number of males, therefore, that were enumerated as 'inmates'/'patients', of the Poor Law Infirmaries that were situated within London's 'East End', in accordance with the Census of England & Wales, 1891; was 2,474.

--- More to Follow ---

Jon Simons
05-30-2010, 05:54 AM
Many thanks for posting your findings on this most interesting person, Colin. As you note, "a Geographic Profiler's 'dream-come-true'!

I will not muddy your superb presentation with my own thoughts, for what they are worth, until you have concluded your findings. I am particularly interested in your conclusion on the likelihood of the suspicious infirmary patient (if he existed) and John Simmonds being the same.

Once again, great stuff!! Looking forward to your conclusions.

Jon

Colin Roberts
06-04-2010, 07:14 PM
As you note, "a Geographic Profiler's 'dream-come-true'!"

I will not muddy your superb presentation with my own thoughts, for what they are worth, until you have concluded your findings. I am particularly interested in your conclusion on the likelihood of the suspicious infirmary patient (if he existed) and John Simmonds being the same.

I have more ground to cover, Jon. But, please, come on in!

---------

Holborn Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Combined Parish of St. Andrew Holborn ('Above the Bars') & St. George the Martyr: 26,228
----- {Portion of the Parish of St. Andrew Holborn within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: n/k}
----- {The Parish of St. George the Martyr: n/k}
- Gray's Inn: 253
- Furnival's Inn: 121
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 97}
----- {Portion within the City of London: 24}
- Lincoln's Inn: 27
- Staple Inn: 21
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 18}
----- {Portion within the City of London: 3}
- The Liberty of Saffron Hill, Hatton Garden, Ely Rents and Ely Place: 4,506
- The Combined Parish of St. James & St. John Clerkenwell: 66,216
----- {The Parish of St. James Clerkenwell: n/k}
----- {The Parish of St. John Clerkenwell: n/k}
- The Parish of St. Sepulchre ('without Newgate'): 1,972
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 1,972}
- The Charter House: 136
- The Parish of St. Luke: 42,440

The Combined Parish of St. James & St. John Clerkenwell included a portion of the settlement of Pentonville; and, the Parish of St. Luke included a portion of the settlement of Finsbury, as well as a very minor portion of the settlement of Hoxton.

- Total Population - Holborn Registration District (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 141,920

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 70,004
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 71,916

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 7,157
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 6,774
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 6,333
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 5,488
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 4,861
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 4,114
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 3,488
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 2,819

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 41,034
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 36,740*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

Gray's Inn (253) and Lincoln's Inn (27) were both components of the Holborn Registration District (141,920); but, neither was a component of any Poor Law Union.

- Total Population - Holborn Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 141,640

---

City of London Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Municipality of the City of London: 37,705
----- {All Constituent Parochial and Extra-Parochial Entities, Included Herein: 37,705}
- The Liberty of Glasshouse Yard: 779

The Liberty of Glasshouse Yard (779), which originally constituted the portion of the Parish of St. Botolph without Aldersgate, that was situated within the County of Middlesex (i.e. outside the City of London), was included within the Registration / Poor Law administration of the City of London.

The Middle Temple (95), along with those portions of Furnival's Inn (24), Staple Inn (3), and the Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel (42), which were situated within the Municipality of the City of London (37,705), were not included within the Registration / Poor Law administration of the City of London.

- Total Population - City of London Registration District (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 38,320

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 19,321
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 18,999

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 2,639
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 2,847
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 1,831
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 1,415
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 1,197
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 1,094
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 966
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 752

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 12,741
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 11,158*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

The Inner Temple (96) was a component of the City of London Registration District (38,320); but, was not a component of any Poor Law Union.

- Total Population - City of London Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 38,224

---

Shoreditch Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. Leonard Shoreditch: 124,009

The Parish of St. Leonard Shoreditch included the settlements of Hoxton, Holywell and Haggerston, as well as a portion of the settlement of Finsbury.

- Total Population - Shoreditch Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 124,009

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 60,790
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 63,219

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 6,188
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 5,689
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 5,302
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 4,743
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 3,956
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 3,496
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 2,619
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 2,144

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 34,137
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 30,424*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

---

Bethnal Green Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. Matthew Bethnal Green: 129,132

The Parish of St. Matthew Bethnal Green included a portion of the settlement of Globe Town.

- Total Population - Bethnal Green Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 129,132

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 63,308
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 65,824

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 6,609
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 5,717
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 5,147
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 4,562
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 3,850
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 3,374
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 2,760
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 2,271

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 34,290
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 30,325*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

---

Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Liberty of Norton Folgate: 1,449
- The Old Artillery Ground: 2,138
- The Parish of Christ Church Spitalfields: 22,859
- The Hamlet of Mile End New Town: 11,303
- The Parish of Holy Trinity ('Minories'): 301
- The Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel: 32,326
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 32,284}
----- {Portion within the City of London, -1900: 42}
- The Liberty of Her Majesty's Tower of London: 933
----- {The Liberty of the Tower: n/a}
----- {The Precinct of Old Tower Without: 65}
----- {The Tower: 868}
- The Precinct of St. Katharine: 182
- The Parish of St. Botolph without Aldgate: 2,971
----- {Portion within the County of Middlesex, -1889; the County of London, 1889-1965: 2,971}

The portion of the Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel (42) that was situated within the Municipality of the City of London, was a component of the Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union; until becoming a part of the Parish of St. Botolph without Aldgate, City of London, in 1900; and accordingly being included within the Registration / Poor Law administration of the City of London.

- Total Population - Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 74,462

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 38,935
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 35,527

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 4,012
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 4,430
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 3,805
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 3,172
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 2,649
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 2,290
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 1,758
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 1,536

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 23,652
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 21,245*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

---

Mile End Old Town Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Hamlet of Mile End Old Town: 107,592

The Hamlet of Mile End Old Town included portions of the settlements of Globe Town, Stepney and Bow Common.

- Total Population - Mile End Old Town Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 107,592

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 52,340
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 55,252

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 5,227
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 5,028
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 4,667
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 3,839
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 3,253
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 2,672
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 2,448
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 1,858

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 28,992
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 25,856*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

---

St. George in the East Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. George in the East: 45,795

- Total Population - St. George in the East Registration District / Poor Law Parish (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 45,795

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 23,096
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 22,699

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 2,176
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 2,313
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 2,133
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 1,844
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 1,469
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 1,222
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 1,091
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 862

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 13,110
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 11,804*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

---

Stepney Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. John of Wapping: 2,123
- The Parish of St. Paul Shadwell: 8,123
- The Hamlet of Ratcliff: 14,928
- The Parish of St. Anne Limehouse: 32,202

The Hamlet of Ratcliff included a portion of the settlement of Stepney.

- Total Population - Stepney Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 57,376

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 29,403
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 27,973

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 3,190
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 2,756
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 2,508
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 2,136
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 1,914
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 1,755
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 1,461
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 1,144

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 16,864
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 14,950*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

---

Poplar Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891):
- The Parish of St. Mary Stratford Bow: 40,365
- The Parish of Bromley St. Leonard: 70,000
- The Parish of All Saints Poplar: 56,383

The Parish of St. Mary Stratford Bow included the settlement of Old Ford; the Parish of Bromley St. Leonard included a portion of the settlement of Bow Common; and, the Parish of All Saints Poplar included the settlements of Millwall, Cubitt Town and Blackwall.

- Total Population - Poplar Registration District / Poor Law Union (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 166,748

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 84,302
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 82,446

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 8,404
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 7,532
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 6,734
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 5,955
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 5,329
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 4,580
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 4,107
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 3,419

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 46,060
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 41,018*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

---

Total - All Registration Districts / Poor Law Constituencies, for which There Was a Poor Law Infirmary, Situated within London's 'East End'
- Holborn Registration District / Poor Law Union: 141,920
- City of London Registration District / Poor Law Union: 38,320
- Shoreditch Registration District / Poor Law Parish: 124,009
- Bethnal Green Registration District / Poor Law Parish: 129,132
- Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union: 74,462
- Mile End Old Town Registration District / Poor Law Parish: 107,592
- St. George in the East Registration District / Poor Law Parish: 45,795
- Stepney Registration District / Poor Law Union: 57,376
- Poplar Registration District / Poor Law Union: 166,748

- Total Population - All Registration Districts / Poor Law Constituencies, for which There Was a Poor Law Infirmary, Situated within London's 'East End' (Census of England & Wales, 1891): 885,354

- Total Population - Male (1891 Census): 441,499
- Total Population - Female (1891 Census): 443,855

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-19 (1891 Census): 45,602
- Total Population - Male; Ages 20-to-24 (1891 Census): 43,086
- Total Population - Male; Ages 25-to-29 (1891 Census): 38,460
- Total Population - Male; Ages 30-to-34 (1891 Census): 33,154
- Total Population - Male; Ages 35-to-39 (1891 Census): 28,478
- Total Population - Male; Ages 40-to-44 (1891 Census): 24,597
- Total Population - Male; Ages 45-to-49 (1891 Census): 20,698
- Total Population - Male; Ages 50-to-54 (1891 Census): 16,805

- Total Population - Male; Ages 15-to-54 (1891 Census): 250,880
- Estimated Total Population - Male; Ages 18-to-54 (1891 Census): 223,519*

* Figure for 'Ages 15-to-19' reduced by 60 percent.

So, of the 885,354 persons, enumerated as resident, in one of the Registration Districts / Poor Law constituencies, for which there was a Poor Law Infirmary, situated within London's 'East End', in accordance with the Census of England & Wales, 1891: 441,499 (i.e. 49.87%) were male.

And, of the 441,499 males, so enumerated: Approximately 223,519 (i.e. 50.63%) were between the ages of eighteen and fifty four.

It can be reasonably estimated, therefore; that of the 2,474 males, enumerated as 'inmates'/'patients', of the Poor Law Infirmaries that were situated within London's 'East End', in accordance with the Census of England & Wales, 1891: Approximately 1,253 (i.e. 50.63%) were between the ages of eighteen and fifty four.

---------

It would seem unlikely, so I would think; that anyone under the age of eighteen, or over the age of fifty four, would arouse any suspicion, with regard to the sequence of so-called 'Whitechapel Murders' that had occurred prior to publication of the article, which perhaps makes reference to John Simmonds.

Again;

... in The Star 12th Oct 88:

'A Suspicious Infirmary Patient'

"A report was current late last night that the police suspect a man who is at present a patient in an East-end infirmary. He has been admitted since the commission of the last murder. Owing to his suspicious behavior their attention was directed to him. Detectives are making inquiries, and he is kept under surveillance."(My Emphasis/Color-Shading)

"... a man who is at present a patient in an East-end infirmary."

And, so again; just what is the likelihood that this "patient in an East-end infirmary"* and John Simmonds were one and the same?

* Assuming, of course, that he even existed.

I believe that it is reasonable, at this juncture, to suggest that the article makes reference to an individual, belonging to a 'field' of approximately 1,253 males, between the ages of eighteen and fifty four.

However, this 'field' is reduced, to perhaps as little as one quarter of its estimated size, of approximately 1,253, i.e. ~313, by consideration of the criteria, set forth in the article:

1.) "... at present a patient in an East-end infirmary." (October 12, 1888)

2.) "... admitted since the commission of the last murder."

Admissions to the Whitechapel Union Infirmary (September 30, 1888 -to- October 12, 1888):
- Sunday, September 30, 1888: 0
- Monday, October 1, 1888: 9
- Tuesday, October 2, 1888: 13
- Wednesday, October 3, 1888: 10
- Thursday, October 4, 1888: 11
- Friday, October 5, 1888: 11
- Saturday, October 6, 1888: 6
- Sunday, October 7, 1888: 2
- Monday, October 8, 1888: 16
- Tuesday, October 9, 1888: 19 (Including John Simmonds)
- Wednesday, October 10, 1888: 15
- Thursday, October 11, 1888: 10
- Friday, October 12, 1888: 13

- Sub-Total: 135

Less, Those Admissions that Do Not Meet Each Criterion:
- Monday, October 1, 1888: -1 (Discharged 2-10-88)
- Wednesday, October 3, 1888: -1 (Discharged 10-10-88)
- Thursday, October 4, 1888: -1 (Discharged 6-10-88); -1 (Discharged 9-10-88)
- Friday, October 5, 1888: -2 (Discharged 5-10-88; i.e. Same Day)
- Saturday, October 6, 1888: -1 (Discharged 9-10-88)
- Monday, October 8, 1888: -1 (Discharged 10-10-88)
- Friday, October 12, 1888: -6 (Those Admitted After 12:00PM; i.e. Presumably Too Late, to be Mentioned in any 'Evening Editions', that May Have Been Printed, by The Star)

- Sub-Total: -14

Total: 121

So; in the case of the Whitechapel Union Infirmary, a total of 121 inmates, i.e. 20.20% of the number of inmates (599) enumerated in accordance with the Census of England & Wales, 1891, met the aforementioned criteria:

Again;

1.) "... at present a patient in an East-end infirmary." (October 12, 1888)

2.) "... admitted since the commission of the last murder."

It is reasonable, therefore, to estimate that a total of 253 male inmates, of the Poor Law Infirmaries that were situated within London's 'East End', between the ages of eighteen and fifty four, i.e. 20.20% of the number of such inmates (1,253) enumerated in accordance with the Census of England & Wales, 1891, met the same criteria.

In other words: It is reasonable, therefore, to estimate that at any given time, approximately 20.00% of inmates*, of the Poor Law Infirmaries that were situated within London's 'East End', had been admitted within the prior thirteen-day period.

* i.e. ...

- 20.00% of all inmates
- 20.00% of all male inmates
- 20.00% of all male inmates, between the ages of eighteen and fifty four
- etc ...

In order to minimize the potential for bias, however, I will estimate that in most instances, no more than 25.00% of inmates*, of the Poor Law Infirmaries that were situated within London's 'East End', had been admitted within the prior thirteen-day period.

* i.e. ...

- 25.00% of all inmates
- 25.00% of all male inmates
- 25.00% of all male inmates, between the ages of eighteen and fifty four
- etc ...

Therefore, I will estimate that in this particular instance, no more than 25.00% of male inmates, between the ages of eighteen and fifty four, of the Poor Law Infirmaries that were situated within London's 'East End', had been admitted within the prior thirteen-day period, i.e. ...

"since the commission of the last murder".

25.00%, in this particular instance, equates to 313.

The subject of the article, therefore, was drawn, by my best estimation, from a 'field' of no more than 313 male inmates, between the ages of eighteen and fifty four, of the Poor Law Infirmaries that were situated within London's 'East End', that met the aforementioned criteria:

Once, again;

1.) "... at present a patient in an East-end infirmary." (October 12, 1888)

2.) "... admitted since the commission of the last murder."

The 'field' can be even further reduced, to approximately ~250, by assuming the subjective point of view, that few, if any, journalists would have referred to the Holborn Union Infirmary, Shepherdess Walk, Parish of St. Leonard Shoreditch, as an "East-end infirmary", even though Shoreditch was generally considered an 'East End' parish, in 1888.

Like the City of London Union Infirmary, Bow Road, Parish of Bromley St. Leonard; the Holborn Union Infirmary provided infirmary-based 'Poor Relief', to a non 'East End' constituency. But, unlike the City of London Union Infirmary, which was situated well-within the perceived parameters of London's 'East End', in 1888; the Holborn Union Infirmary was on the western-most fringes of London's 'East End', and was, in fact, quite literally, on the boundary that separated the Parishes of St. Luke and St. Leonard Shoreditch.

So, yet again; just what is the likelihood that this "patient in an East-end infirmary"* and John Simmonds were one and the same?

* Assuming, of course, that he even existed.

I'll say, at this point, ... approximately 1/250!

And, that's not bad!

And, upon consideration of some additional subjective factors, such as my perception of the circumstances surrounding the admission/discharge of John Simmonds, from the Whitechapel Union Infirmary, ...

--- More to Follow ---

Colin Roberts
06-05-2010, 09:44 PM
I have managed to locate two 'potentially likely' matches, in the records of the Census of England & Wales, 1881 & 1891:

Census of England & Wales, 1881:
Registration District: St. George in the East
Civil Parish: St. George in the East
Registration Sub-District: St. Mary
Enumeration District: 2
Page: 37
"12 Denmark Street"
"John Simmonds"
"15"
"Scholar"
"Middx / London"

---

Census of England & Wales, 1891:
Registration District: Whitechapel
Civil Parish: Christ Church Spitalfields
Registration Sub-District: Spitalfields
Enumeration District: 5
Page: 40
"55 Flower & Dean Street"
"John Simmonds"
"30"
"Orange Porter"
"Hackney"

I have also managed to locate a likely reference to the latter of the two 'potentially likely' matches, in the Register of Deaths, Whitechapel Union Infirmary, 1900:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4068/4632321083_bf780eb1cf.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4632321083/sizes/o/)
Register of Deaths: Whitechapel Union Infirmary, 1900 (Click Image, to Enlarge in flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4632321083/sizes/o/))

Date of Death: "September 16th, 1900"
Name: "Simmonds, John"
Age: "40"
Cause of Death: "Inquest"


And, I have managed to locate a likely reference to the former of the two 'potentially likely' matches, in the Index of Births, Marriages and Deaths.

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4047/4673426280_434395cbd1.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4673426280/sizes/l/)
Index of Births: Second Quarter, 1867 (Click Image, to Enlarge in flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/septic_blue/4673426280/sizes/l/))

"Simmonds, John Morley"
"St. Geo. East", i.e. St. George in the East Registration District / Poor Law Parish

--- More to Follow ---

Jon Simons
06-06-2010, 05:39 AM
Hello All

Suspects and theories abound, yet, I suspect the majority of Ripperologists would plum for the unknown local male. Despite the nonsense recorded by their superiors, Abberline and Reid openly admitted they had nothing on no-one, and I`ll go along with their wise and sober judgement of the case.

Despite my nihilistic approach to the Ripper suspect game, John Simmonds jumped out of the 1888 Whitechapel Infirmary records. I was looking for a patient who was "off the streets" during October. I first thought that Simmonds was discharged on Nov 8th, but Colin has shown that it was probably Nov 5th that he was discharged. His date of admittance was Oct 9th.

Okay, so Simmonds was off the street during October. No big deal. But then we look at why he was off the streets during the month the Ripper was quiet.
The cause of his admittance is given as syphilis, the old, classic motive for revenge. Simmonds was 22 years old, so perhaps was too young to be suffering from the Tertiary Stage of syphilis, the stage that the sufferer starts losing it mentally, which occurs after many years of infection. Taking into account Simmonds age, and the time spent in the infirmary, I would hazard a guess that he was suffering from the Secondary Stage of syphilis, which I have condensed into the following:

Secondary – lasts from 3 weeks to 9 months
Several weeks after the sores have healed the bacteria has spread and the symptoms that can appear are headaches, achiness, loss of appetite, a widespread reddy brown rash, swollen lymph nodes and patchy hair loss.

What other self-proclaimed information does Simmonds provide us with? He tells us he is a Hawker. The same living that we are told that Eddowes and Tabram occasionally relied upon.

Simmonds gives his settlement period for Whitechapel Registration District / Poor Law Union as five months. He moved into the area sometime in May 88. For the record, it looks like our John Simmonds was born and raised in St George in the East.

Now, before I touch on Simmonds address of 60 Wentworth St I would like to acknowledge Colin`s superb research and presentation. You will now be aware that residing at 60 Wentworth St during the murders, Simmonds "should be perceived as having fallen within the 95th percentile (i.e. the top 4.96%) of the distribution of probability, regarding the location of the perpetrator's base of operations."

George Yard Buildings was literally across the road from his lodgings, and (warning -some wild speculation on my part) the Ripper, judging by where the rag was discarded in a doorway near the corner of Goulston St, was heading east, up Wentworth St.

We also have the article in The Star from Oct 12th, regarding the recently admitted suspicious infirmary patient . Simmonds was admitted on the 9th. Again, Colin has shown that after taking in all the East End Infirmaries, there was a 1/250 chance that Simmonds and the suspicious Infirmary patient were the same.

Colin- many thanks for finding and posting the Census info and Infirmary records on the two possible Simmonds. Certainly, John Morley who was 15 in 1881 matches the 22 year old in 1888. Interesting that the older Simmonds, who was 28 in 1888, required an inquest into his death in 1900.

I see Dr Herbert Larder was still at the Infirmary in 1900. He was there in 1888 as we know he saw to Annie Farmer in Nov 88, so Larder may have seen to both John Simmonds. Interesting to note that the older Simmonds was an Orange Porter like Danny Barnett and lived at the same address as Eddowes.

Looking forward to the rest of your findings

Jon

Roy Corduroy
06-06-2010, 10:52 AM
His lodging was within the house to house search area. But at that time, was he home, or in the infirmary?

Colin Roberts
06-06-2010, 11:08 AM
George Yard Buildings was literally across the road from his lodgings, ...

Indeed, Jon!

http://photos.casebook.org/albums/george1/30George67.jpg
George Yard Buildings, George Yard, Parish of St. Mary Whitechapel
Stewart P. Evans, 1967

The self-proclaimed October, 1888, address of John Simmonds, 60 Wentworth Street, Parish of Christ Church Spitalfields, was situated immediately to the right of the front end of the light-colored automobile.

Note: The entire length of Wentworth Street, from Middlesex Street -to- Brick Lane / Osborn Street, marked the southern-most portion of the boundary that separated the Parishes of Christ Church Spitalfields and St. Mary Whitechapel. The light-colored automobile, in Stewart's photograph, therefore, is parked in Spitalfields; while the darker-colored truck (lorry) is parked in Whitechapel.

... after taking in all the East End Infirmaries, there was a 1/250 chance that Simmonds and the suspicious Infirmary patient were the same.

And upon consideration of the circumstances surrounding the Whitechapel Union Infirmary's 1888 admission/discharge of John Simmonds, which you have very clearly delineated, Jon; I would perceive a 1/25 chance that the two were indeed, one and the same.

Looking forward to the rest of your findings

Jon

I have a few additional 'potentially likely' matches, from various census records; but, I feel, at this point, that John Morley Simmonds is, by far, the best bet. I may go ahead, and order his birth certificate, in which case, I will post it upon receipt.

---------

This is, as I have already stated; a Geographic Profiler's 'dream-come-true'!

My Geographic Profile Model, in this instance, has done all that it, or any other similar model*, could possibly be expected to do: Lend credence and significance to suspicions that have been aroused by way of some other investigative approach.

* My Geographic Profile Model is based entirely on some very simple conventions of the study of Probability & Statistics, as well as a very simple premise, regarding the likelihood of an 'operator' residing within his 'field of operations'. It does not incorporate the use of exotically complex distance-decay functions; nor does it utilize the subjective concept of buffer-zones. It can be used, merely, to generate either a circular or elliptical 'net', that when cast upon the murder-site Mean-Center, should be expected to capture the base/residence of a perpetrator, at a particular degree of probability / level of expectation, in accordance with its chosen size.

My model, therefore, would be perceived as being far to 'simple', by most professional profilers. But, therein, in my opinion, lies its true practicality.

Either way; I cannot imagine a geographic profile that would lend anything less than a compelling degree of credence and significance to the suspicions that have been aroused, regarding John Simmonds.

Roy Corduroy
06-06-2010, 01:23 PM
Colin's map. 60 Wentworth Street in yellow.

7723

I dont' know when exactly they searched his street. If they came after Oct 9 and learned he was in infirmary, they could have thought "Hmm, let's go there and see what ails him."

Roy

Jon Simons
06-06-2010, 01:28 PM
His lodging was within the house to house search area. But at that time, was he home, or in the infirmary?

When was the house to house, Roy? Simmonds went in on Tuesday, 9th Oct.

In the 1881 Census, 60 Wentworth St was a Common Lodging House, but I can`t find the address in the 1891 Census, to see if it was still a Common Lodging House.

Edit: I`ve just seen our posts crossed. If the address was still a L.H. the Police may have been knocking early doors.

Colin Roberts
06-06-2010, 01:33 PM
Colin's map. 60 Wentworth Street in yellow.

That's Rob Clack's work, Roy.

Roy Corduroy
06-06-2010, 01:56 PM
Oops, my bad. Credit due to Rob Clack. Thank you for the correction, Colin.

Jon, the Met house to house searches commenced Oct 13. Sugden:

7724

So yes, Simmonds was in infirmary at the time.

Jon Simons
06-06-2010, 02:07 PM
Nice one, Roy. Cheers.

Roy Corduroy
06-06-2010, 05:08 PM
Thank you Jon, and this is quite a find you have made.

As per the particular police suspicion voiced in the news article published on 12th Oct, the house to house searches may be a non-issue. Because the searches did not commence till the 13th.

I had it backwards, picturing a scenario whereby the police search found him absent at lodgings, then went to infirmary seeking more info about him. It didn't happen that way.

Roy

Roy Corduroy
06-06-2010, 11:50 PM
ps- Colin, your research in this matter is, as usual, outstanding.

Roy

Colin Roberts
06-11-2010, 07:09 AM
Colin, your research in this matter is, as usual, ...

Many Thanks, Roy!