Jack The Ripper Forums  - Ripperology For The 21st Century  

Go Back   Jack The Ripper Forums - Ripperology For The 21st Century > Inquest and Doctors' Reports

Inquest and Doctors' Reports Forum for discussion of the coroner's reports and inquest reports for the various victims of the Whitechapel Murders, including the observations and autopsy reports by the attending physicians

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old January 29th, 2010, 07:28 AM   #21
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Howard Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 73,090
Default

Baxter's style is evident in this case. Notice the remark about a typhoon....

Daily News
Friday, September 5, 1884


__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2015, 12:09 PM   #22
Simon Wood
Author, Researcher
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 513
Default Wynne Baxter - Coroner, Advertising Agent & Fraudster

Hi All,

HANSARD—House of Commons resolution, 25th May 1894.

The Parliamentary Election [Returning Officer's] Expenses Act, 1875—

Mr William Caine [Bradford E.]—

In 1885 he contested the Tottenham Division of Middlesex—one of the largest divisions in the United Kingdom. He did not know who the Sheriff was, but he had a lively recollection of the Under Sheriff—Mr. Wynne E. Baxter—who had charge of the three divisions of Tottenham, Enfield, and Hornsey. According to law this gentleman was bound to do the very best he could for the candidates to whom he was responsible; to expend the smallest amount of money practicable in providing what was necessary for the machinery of the election.

The Act, unfortunately, laid down a maximum, and this gentleman ingeniously charged each division the full maximum allowed by law, using the same machinery in each case, with, of course, the exception of printing. He charged him (Mr. Caine) and his opponent a good round sum for ballot boxes; then he sold the same boxes to Hornsey, and afterwards resold them again to Enfield, making a handsome profit in each instance. In one case he hired from the Guildhall a set of fittings kept in stock for all kinds of elections. He paid one guinea for the use of those fittings and charged him, as Liberal candidate, £52 10s.

But this gentleman was not content with that, for, having made all these various charges, he took care to send in his account just the day before that on which the account of the election expenses had to be returned. The consequence was, that only three courses were open—to pay and say nothing, to return the account as disputed, or else to have it taxed.

Having, after some difficulty, persuaded his opponent to take the matter into the County Court in order to have the account taxed, they asked for vouchers, and the only voucher Mr. Baxter produced was a voucher signed for the full amount by a firm called Baxter & Co., advertising agents. Investigation showed that Baxter & Co. was nothing but Mr. Wynne E. Baxter, who had created himself into a firm for the purpose of supplying the Sheriff with the necessary machinery of the elections. He produced a receipt for the full amount "as agreed," giving no details whatever, and this he had the impudence to tender in Court as a complete voucher for the enormous amount of money which he had overcharged the candidates.

On being pressed he was compelled to admit that "Baxter & Co." was no other than himself. The fact was brought out that Mr. Baxter, as Under Sheriff and solicitor, must have advised the Sheriff to make an agreement to pay Baxter, as advertising agent, double the legal maximum. There was a charge of £48 for professional services. On inquiry it was brought out that these professional services were for "advising the Sheriff in the conduct of the election." So that the House would see that he as candidate was called upon to pay his share of the £48 to this person for advising the Sheriff to enter into a contract with Baxter himself, on the pretext of his being an advertising agent. The Registrar of the County Court before whom the matter came characterised the document as a bogus voucher, and the result was that the Returning Officer's charges were cut down by some £670, and he was made to pay the costs besides.

He could assure the House that the cheque he received in respect of the over-payments he had been compelled to make to the Returning Officer was the sweetest bit of money he had ever put into his pocket. All that he could say was that he now regretted that when he was asked to pay such outrageous charges he had not proceeded against the Under Sheriff and sued him for the penalty of £500 for extortion.

Regards,

Simon
Simon Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2015, 01:46 PM   #23
Cris Malone
Historian
 
Cris Malone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jackson, Tennessee
Posts: 2,403
Default

Yep...

http://www.jtrforums.com/showpost.ph...36&postcount=8
__________________
Best Wishes,
Cris Malone
______________________________________________
"Objectivity comes from how the evidence is treated, not the nature of the evidence itself. Historians can be just as objective as any scientist."
Cris Malone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2015, 04:48 PM   #24
Lynn Cates
Researcher & Author
 
Lynn Cates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7,188
Default interesting

Hello Simon. Interesting.

Cheers.
LC
Lynn Cates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2015, 07:25 PM   #25
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Howard Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 73,090
Default

Thanks for that, Simon and Cris. I hadn't seen it before.
__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 18th, 2015, 08:02 PM   #26
Jerry Dunlop
Information Extractor
 
Jerry Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 1,173
Default Sarcastic at Inquest

Don't know why this came out so large? It was at minimal size when I cut it? Sorry!


London St James Gazette June 1, 1901

Jerry Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 18th, 2015, 08:43 PM   #27
Gary Barnett
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 6,159
Default

Name:  image.jpg
Views: 52
Size:  84.1 KB
Gary Barnett is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2017, 05:40 PM   #28
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Howard Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 73,090
Default Baxter & A Boxing Day Jury

St. James's Gazette
December 28, 1896
*****************
__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wynne Baxter trivia Cris Malone Inquest and Doctors' Reports 23 February 24th, 2015 09:19 PM
Wynne Baxter : Starvation At Christmas ( 1891 ) Howard Brown Inquest and Doctors' Reports 0 May 29th, 2013 03:52 PM
Winslow Articles To Accompany "Winslow A Charlatan ?" Thread Howard Brown Forbes Winslow 36 May 4th, 2012 05:30 AM
What Wynne Baxter Means To The WM Howard Brown Inquest and Doctors' Reports 23 May 14th, 2010 04:22 PM
Wynne E Baxter - Coroner Debbie McDonald Inquest and Doctors' Reports 3 January 13th, 2009 04:06 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright @ Howard & Nina Brown 2015-2022