Jack The Ripper Forums  - Ripperology For The 21st Century  

Go Back   Jack The Ripper Forums - Ripperology For The 21st Century > Persons Of Interest or Actual Suspects > Prince Albert Victor

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 9th, 2011, 06:06 PM   #1
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 77,197
Default Prince Albert Victor : The King Who Never Was

The King Who Never Was:
Andrew Cook takes a look at the Duke of Clarence, grandson of Queen Victoria, who is most often remembered
as a wastrel who died young, and is sometimes mentioned as a suspect for Jack the Ripper murders; he uncovers
fresh evidence that he was a well-loved figure who could have made a fine king.
************************************************** *********************
ONE NEEDS TO GO BACK TO the Middle Ages, to Richard III and John, to find a significant royal figure whose
reputation has been so besmirched by historians as Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence and Avondale (1864
-92). Eddy, as he was known throughout his life, was the eldest son of Edward VII and second in line to the
throne for the twenty-eight brief years of his life.
It has often been suggested that Eddy was a disappointment to Queen Victoria. In reality, however, he was her
favourite grandson and the warmth between them is evident from personal correspondence. To the public at
large, Eddy was as popular and charismatic a figure in his own lifetime as Princess Diana a century later. As
in her case, his sudden and unexpected death in 1892 resulted in what The Times described as 'manifestations
of grief' rarely witnessed in Britain. Yet, a hundred years later it was rumoured that he (again like Diana)
had been murdered to prevent him tainting the reputation of the monarchy. Had he lived, he would no doubt
have been crowned Edward VIII in 1911, and he would have ushered in a profoundly different style of monarchy
from that of his younger brother, who as George V did succeed to the throne on the death of their father
Edward VII in May 1910. The two princes were exceedingly close and were virtually inseparable during their
childhood, being tutored by Reverend John Dalton, who also remained responsible for their education as naval
cadets. George was to remain in the Navy while Eddy later joined the 10th Hussars. Army records indicate that
he became a competent and respected officer who took well to army life and discipline. Despite later claims
that Eddy was lacking in academic ability, there was, in reality, little difference between the two boys'
achievements.
************************
Eddy's life was virtually ignored by historians until the 1970s, when myths began to accumulate and his
character somehow grew horns and a tail. As a result, he is primarily thought of today as a suspect in the
Jack the Ripper murders of 1888 and for his alleged involvement in the Cleveland Street homosexual brothel
scandal of 1889. Like those medieval monarchs whose dire reputations have very much been determined in the
contemporary mind by William Shakespeare, Eddy's has certainly been shaped by popular films such as Murder by
Decree (1976),Jack the Ripper (1988) and From Hell (2001).
The rumours of Eddy's involvement in the Ripper episode can be traced back just four decades. It is now
acknowledged by most serious researchers of the Ripper killings that the creator of the Eddy Ripper myth was
eighty-five-year-old Dr Thomas Stowell, whose article 'Jack the Ripper--A Solution?' appeared in the
Criminologist in November 1970. His article painted a picture of a crazed syphilitic murderer roaming the
East End, vainly pursued by his doctor. The killer, referred to throughout the article as 'S', was apparently
a patient of the Royal Physician Sir William Withey Gull, who was convinced that S was the Ripper and strove
to have him certified insane. The article also provided a potted biography of S, which quite clearly pointed
the finger at Prince Eddy. Not surprisingly, the wider media seized on the story, which was soon reported
throughout the world as effectively naming Eddy as the murderer. Stowell, stunned by the degree of attention
the article received, wrote to The Times in panic, lamely denying that S was Eddy. But Stowell died on
November 8th just after the story broke and before he could be subjected to further scrutiny, and his son
tried to defuse the furore by destroying his papers. Although the article contained numerous factual errors
and recycled several established Ripper tales, the fuse had already been lit. Numerous others would follow in
Stowell's footsteps, each embellishing and refining the story.
************************************
A little-known French biography Edouard VII by Philippe Jullian was published in 1962 and may seem to
challenge Stowell's role as the originator of the Eddy-ripper myth. According to Jullian:

On one occasion the police
discovered the Duke in a maison de
recontre ... the rumour soon gained
ground that he was Jack the Ripper.
****************************************
Here was a text that pre-dated Stowell by eight years and seemed to be based upon some earlier source that
Eddy was indeed the subject of contemporary Ripper rumour. However, the writer Colin Wilson claims that in
August 1960 he had lunched with Stowell, who propounded his Eddy theory in some detail. Wilson, who was at
the time writing Encyclopaedia of Murder (1961), was not wholly taken with the theory, but that same evening
he related the story that Stowell had told him to the biographer and politician Sir Harold Nicolson. The
Jullian book contains no index or source notes, but its acknowledgements page contains the following
sentence:

In England it is to Sir Harold
Nicolson, for allowing me to delve
into his works and for telling me a
number of hitherto unpublished
anecdotes, that I am most indebted.So the trail finally returned to Stowell. From so little substance so
much has subsequently been made.
***********************************
In 1889 a scandal blew up around the exposure of a male brothel at 19 Cleveland Street in London's Fitzrovia.
Despite largely retrospective assertions that Eddy was among those who had frequented it, there is no
tangible evidence that he ever did so, nor indeed that he was either homosexual or bisexual. Eddy's
association resulted from a fraudulent attempt by one Arthur Newton, the solicitor of Lord Arthur Somerset,
an equerry to the Prince of Wales, to prevent his client being prosecuted for his own involvement. Newton's
tactic was to suggest that Somerset threaten to implicate Eddy if he himself was arrested and brought to
trial. This worked a treat and Somerset was allowed to creep away and spend the rest of his life in self-
imposed exile on the Cote d'Azur. Newton later tried perverting the course of justice once too often and was
eventually struck-off by the Law Society in 1913. Some twentieth-century writers have further attempted to
link Eddy's name with that of Somerset by drawing attention to the presence of an Arthur Somerset at a party
held in Luton Hoo in November 1891 to mark Eddy's engagement to Princess May of Teck (who was later to marry
Eddy's brother George and become Queen Mary). However, my new research has established that this guest was
the Hon Arthur Somerset, not the disgraced Lord Arthur Somerset, his second cousin.
**********************************
The eccentric theories concerning the Prince reached their nadir in 1991 when Melvyn Fairclough published The
Ripper and the Royals. Reproducing extracts from a diary allegedly written by Inspector Frederick Abberline
of Scotland Yard, the chief investigator of the Ripper murders, Fairclough not only tied Eddy into the Ripper
murders, but implicated a host of others--including Lord Randolph Churchill. New Scotland Yard have
subsequently expressed the view that the Abberline Diary is a forgery. On each occasion a Ripper murder took
place, Eddy was in fact not only out of London but was attending functions in front of a large number of
people.
One fanciful theory advanced about Eddy's sudden death in the early weeks of 1892 is that it had been murder
rather than influenza, and Fairclough took this to its illogical conclusion, relating that Eddy had not died
at all but had been kept a prisoner at Glamis Castle in Scotland to prevent him from coming to the throne.
(He apparently died, still a prisoner, in 1933.) Fairclough even published a supposed photograph of Eddy,
aged forty-six, 'eighteen years after his official death'. In order to subject this claim to scientific
analysis, this photograph and one of Eddy taken in 1890, has been presented to Ken Linge BA, MSc, FBIPP, one
of the Britain's leading experts on facial mapping and a veteran Old Bailey forensic witness. The results of
computer analysis using morphological, anthropometric and biometric techniques found numerous and significant
differences between the two photographs, leading Linge to conclude that they were, without doubt, of two
entirely different people.
*******************************
Far from being a liability to the royal family and the nation he was born to rule, Eddy was, in reality a
figure of unfulfilled potential who could have made a significant difference to the lives of his subjects. My
research has uncovered a wealth of correspondence from, to and about him, which throws new light on his
personal and public life. Instead of the dullard portrayed by some late twentieth-century writers, these
papers reveal him to be an educated, articulate and able man with independent political and social opinions.
He was the first senior member of the royal family to attend university (and the last until Prince Charles
went up to the same college, Trinity College, Cambridge in 1967). In 1886, a year after leaving Trinity, his
correspondence with former college friend Harry Wilson of Malvern Link, Worcestershire, indicates that he was
very much in support of prime minister Gladstone's efforts to introduce Home Rule for Ireland. Replying to
Wilson, who had written expressing his own sympathy for the measure, Eddy replied that his views, 'certainly
do you credit as they are only too true'. Shortly after the publication of Gladstone's Home Rule Bill in
1886, Eddy accompanied his father, the Prince of Wales, to a private dinner with Gladstone at Downing Street.
There was apparently little meeting of minds between the two older men--and Gladstone's opinion of the Prince
of Wales' 'total want of political judgement, either inherited or acquired' was well known. The heir to the
throne's view that Gladstone's objectives amounted to 'Irish bull' were equally uncomplimentary.
*******************************
Yet, from correspondence exchanged between Eddy and Gladstone at the time of Eddy's twenty-first birthday the
previous year, it is clear that Gladstone had a much more positive view of the young prince than he had of
his father. Eddy had probably picked up more Liberal views at university than he generally absorbed at home.
As an active member of the university's Pitt Club, he had rubbed shoulders with a number of members who were
in the thick of the debates that were taking place at the height of the Home Rule controversy. One
contemporary was Austen Chamberlain, whose father Joseph helped engineer Gladstone's defeat on the Home Rule
Bill by joining over ninety other Liberals in the Conservative Lobby, thus ensuring its rejection.
********************************
It is also clear from press reports in Ireland that, unlike the rest of the royal family, Eddy was much more
warmly received by the majority of the Catholic population; this was especially evident when he had occasion
to visit Ireland with his parents in 1887. Whereas the Prince of Wales received an exceptionally critical
response, papers like the Dublin Weekly News saw the twenty-three-year-old Eddy as a dashing figure who was,
'not at all bad looking' and would set female 'hearts a-flutter'.
Despite Eddy's liberal views on Ireland, it would seem that Salisbury's Conservative government, which came
to office following Gladstone's election defeat in 1886, were intent on taking advantage of his high personal
standing in Ireland. Documents in the archives of Lord Salisbury reveal that Lord Wolsey, the Commander-in-
Chief in Dublin, had proposed Eddy for the post of Viceroy of Ireland. On January 8th, 1892, Knollys, the
Prince of Wales Private Secretary wrote to Salisbury's Private Secretary;
Many thanks for your letter on the
subject of the Duke of Clarence being
appointed Viceroy of Ireland. I have
shown it to the Prince of Wales, and
he would very much like to see Lord
Salisbury'. HRH will be in London
from Monday afternoon and should
Lord Salisbury be coming to London
on the latter day the Prince would be
very glad to have a few minutes
conversation with him at
Marlborough House or Arlington
Street (whichever would suit Lord
Salisbury the best) at 3.30.
**************************************
Salisbury was apparently unable to come to London and it was instead agreed that the Prince of Wales would
visit Salisbury at his home, Hatfield House in Hertfordshire. However, shortly afterwards, Prince Eddy
contracted flu, and on January 10th, Knollys wrote a second letter:

Will you inform Lord and Lady
Salisbury that owing to the Duke of
Clarence's illness he would be unable
to go to Hatfield--you will see a
statement. Will you at the same time
tell Lord Salisbury that for the above
reason he fears he shall not be able to
keep his appointment with him on
Tuesday.That meeting was never rearranged, as Eddy suddenly died on January 14th, 1892, of influenza and
double pneumonia. Everyone seems to have assumed that he would fight off the illness just as his father and
brother had beaten typhoid. The widespread public outpouring of grief was as much to do with the suddenness
of his death as to the loss of a figure who was seen as a symbol of hope for the future.
Eighteen months after Eddy's death Princess May married his brother Prince George instead. In 1901 Queen
Victoria died and the Prince of Wales became Edward VII. He was succeeded in 1910 by George who would reign
for twenty-five years, creating the Windsor dynasty we have today. Prince Eddy had made almost no mark on
history when he died, and so he was easily forgotten. But what if he had lived? How different might a reign
of King Edward have been?
*********************************
George was a shy king, cold to his wife, cruel to his children, uncertain in the early years of his reign.
Yet his brother, although no brighter, seems to have been a warm-hearted man, someone with a common touch
whose public appearances appear to demonstrate an easy going, relaxed performer who might have set the
monarchy on a very different path.
The first problem of George V's reign was the constitutional crisis of 1910-11 that was sparked off by the
refusal of the House of Lords to pass Lloyd George's budget. The Liberal government's response, to introduce
a Parliament Act curtailing the Lords' power could only succeed if the King gave an undertaking to create
over 200 new Liberal peers to outvote the Conservative majority in the upper House. George was extremely
reluctant to make such a commitment. His secretary, Sir Arthur Bigge advised him to hold firm to his refusal,
even if it meant the resignation of the prime minister and his government. In contrast, his late father's
secretary, Lord Knollys, believed it would fatally compromise the monarchy not to consent, as he believed the
King might incur the charge of attempting to come to the aid of the unelected Chamber in its conflict with
the directly elected Commons. After much pressure from Knollys and much soul-searching on George's part, the
new king reluctantly agreed to make the pledge. It is likely that Eddy, as king, would have given no such
encouragement to the Lords, and would have agreed to back the will of the Commons from the outset, thus
avoiding the further protraction of the constitutional crisis
*********************************
This was not the last time George sought to undermine the policy of his elected government. When, a year
later, the Home Rule issue was back on the agenda, Conservative and Unionist opponents looked again to the
King in the hope that he would take direct or indirect action to frustrate the will of the House of Commons.
Indeed, in May 1912 Conservative leader Andrew Bonar Law approached George privately and suggested that the
royal veto, unused for two hundred years, might be unearthed as a means of stopping the Bill. A few months
later he went further by suggesting that George would be within his rights to oust Prime Minister Asquith.
Far from dismissing such an outlandish proposal, George actually raised the prospect with Asquith, who told
him in no uncertain terms that the constitution did not permit the king to act in such a way. George,
however, persisted in looking for ways of frustrating the government. Arguably this encouraged those like Sir
Edward Carson who openly advocated defying the law and setting up an illegal Protestant breakaway provisional
government in Ulster in case the Home Rule Bill was passed. In such an event the British Army would no doubt
have been ordered to act against a rebellion. In September 1913 George sought to deter Asquith from
considering such action:

Will it be wise, will it be fair to the
Sovereign as head of the
Army, to subject the
discipline, and
indeed the
loyalty of his
troops to such
a strain?
*****************************
Again, given Eddy's views on Home Rule, it is unlikely that those diehard elements opposing the Bill would
have gained any succour or encouragement to further delay or resist the will of Parliament. As a former
Viceroy of Ireland he would also have had the connections and ability to act as a positive mediator in the
run up to the Bill becoming law. Indeed, the history of twentieth-century Ireland could well have been
different had Eddy lived to be king.
Another instance of how Eddy might well have acted differently arose in 1917 when his former sweetheart Alix
of Hesse, now Empress of Russia, and her husband Tsar Nicholas II sought asylum for themselves and their
children in Britain following the February Revolution of that year. George refused the family, fearing their
presence in England might jeopardize his own throne and sought to distance himself from the decision by later
implying that the blame for the asylum refusal lay with his prime minister Lloyd George. Unable to find a
refuge outside Russia, the imperial family eventually found themselves captives of the Bolsheviks and were
executed at Ekaterinberg in July 1918.
After the war George V was reluctantly coerced by his advisers into more 'meeting the people' opportunities,
which he apparently loathed, and eventually into making his landmark Christmas radio broadcast. Eddy would
have needed no such prompting. Recently discovered records of his public appearances show him to have been a
confident speaker. On one occasion, his prepared speech, which had been carefully written down on several
sheets of paper, was mislaid. Eddy, without any fuss or panic proceeded to make the entire speech off the
cuff without anyone suspecting that he was having to improvise from memory.
His empathy for his people would have come somewhat earlier than George's and would have been from the heart.
It would no doubt have given us a very different royal family not only in terms of style but in substance
too. Compassionate, charismatic and able, with a uniquely progressive vision for Britain, Eddy as king might
have created a very different monarchy. The House of Windsor as it exists today is very much George V's
creation. Perhaps that is the real reason why the memory of Eddy, the king we never had, has been allowed to
be so thoroughly besmirched.
*************************************
FOR FURTHER READING
John Dalton, The Criuse of Her Majesty's Ship "Bacchante" 1879-1882 (London 1882); J.D. Rees, HRH The Duke of
Clarence and Avondale in Southern India (London 1891); Andrew Roberts, Salisbury: Victorian Titan (London
1999); Donald Rumbelow, The Complete Jack the Ripper (London 1992);James E. Vincent His Royal Highness the
Duke of Clarence and Avondale: A Memoir (London 1893).
FROM THE HISTORY TODAY ARCHIVE
William D. Rubinstein, 'The Hunt for Jack the Ripper' (May 2000); Elisabeth Darby & Nicola Smith, 'In
Mourning for Prince Albert' (Oct 1983); Lynne Vallone, 'Victoria' (June 2002); Richard Mullen, 'The Last
Marriage of a Prince of Wales, 1863' (June 1981); Francis Watson, 'The Death of George V' (Dec 1986). See
www.historytoday.com
Andrew Cook's Prince Eddy will be published in February 2006 by Tempus (20 [pounds sterling]). His television
programme on 'King Eddy' is due to be transmitted by Channel 4 early in November.
Source Citation
Cook, Andrew. "The king who never was: Andrew Cook takes a look at the Duke of Clarence, grandson of Queen
Victoria, who is most often remembered as a wastrel who died young, and is sometimes mentioned as a suspect
for Jack the Ripper murders; he uncovers fresh evidence that he was a well-loved figure who could have made a
fine king." History Today 55.11 (2005): 40+. Search Journals and Magazines. Web. 9 Feb. 2011.
__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com

Last edited by Howard Brown; February 9th, 2011 at 08:46 PM.
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 06:30 PM   #2
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 77,197
Default

Bump up with typo removed.
__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 10:29 PM   #3
John Savage
The Old Professor
 
John Savage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 604
Default

Hi Howard,

Thanks for that bump up, it brought to mind the connection of author Harold Nicholson to the Eddy as Ripper story, which Andrew Cook, like other authors dates to 1960. However that may not be correct as I did a little research into this a little while ago and made the following note.(Please keep in mind that Nicholson's book King George V was published in 1952)

In his book “Prince Eddy and the Homosexual Underworld” author Theo Aronson says:
“That there had been a conspiracy instigated at the highest levels, there can be very little doubt. Sixty years later, when the writer and politician Harold Nicolson was working on his official life of Prince Eddy’s brother, King George V, he was told by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Goddard, that Prince Eddy ‘had been involved in a male brothel scene, and that a solicitor had to commit perjury to clear him’. And while researching in the Royal Archives, Nicolson made a note in his private diary to the effect that there seems to have been a skilful cover up of the scandal ‘to save the name of the Royal Family”

Aronson acknowledges that the information from Lord Goddard is taken from “Harold Nicolson a Biography Volume 2” by James Lees-Milne. [Page 231]; and that Nicolson making a note in his private diary is taken from “Hugh Dalton” by Ben Pimlott.

A source note in Pimlott’s “Hugh Dalton” appears to suggest that there are private unpublished diaries of Harold Nicolson at Balliol College, Oxford, and reference is also made to a particular date – 16th. February 1949 and this is the time when Nicolson was researching and writing his biography of King George V.

Harold Nicolson’s diaries have been published in three volumes edited by his son Nigel and I have been unable to find an exact reference in these, therefore presume that whatever Harold Nicolson knew must be in his private diaries at Balliol.

Rgds
John
John Savage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2011, 07:11 PM   #4
Stan Reid
Burden to society
 
Stan Reid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
Posts: 3,803
Default

Are there any newspaper reports covering PAVs visit to the United States around 1880?
__________________
This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

Stan
Stan Reid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2011, 08:01 PM   #5
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 77,197
Default

I'm on it Stanley D.

Nothing to report from GenBank
__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2011, 08:04 PM   #6
Stan Reid
Burden to society
 
Stan Reid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
Posts: 3,803
Default

Thanks How. The Wik article (if you can believe) on George V says that he and PAV visited Norfolk, Virginia in the 1879-1882 period. Check for murdered prostitutes. (joke)

The article on John Dalton says that Eddy's mocking shipboard nickname was "Herring". I wonder what that was about.
__________________
This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

Stan
Stan Reid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2011, 08:20 PM   #7
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 77,197
Default PAV : Dull....

New York Times
January 30, 1885
*************

__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2011, 08:24 PM   #8
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 77,197
Default

PAV may have been dull...but I is a dope.
I somehow clicked on just one state which limited the amount of possible articles.
I fixed it and I'll be back.
__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2011, 08:30 PM   #9
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 77,197
Default

On the other hand, PAV's brother was all for shits and giggles...

New Orleans Times Picayune
November 16,1882
**************
__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2011, 08:33 PM   #10
Howard Brown
Proprietor-Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pa.
Posts: 77,197
Default

They're gettin' closer to the mainland...

San Francisco Bulletin
April 6, 1880
*********
__________________
To Join JTR Forums, Contact :
Howard@jtrforums.com
Howard Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gamekeeper was a medium who channelled the spirit of Prince Albert admin tim Ghosts and Apparitions 0 June 16th, 2013 07:26 AM
Broadmoor Criminal Lunatic Asylum Archaic Asylums 39 April 2nd, 2013 09:37 PM
Mama's Baby, Albert Victor's Maybe.... Howard Brown Prince Albert Victor 1 March 7th, 2011 11:02 AM
Prince Eddy Mike Covell Prince Albert Victor 8 December 13th, 2009 08:10 AM
P.C. Ed King Marco Franzoi The British Bobby 2 February 18th, 2008 12:26 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright @ Howard & Nina Brown 2015-2022