Annie Chapman

[Howard Brown]

Thread for discussion and background on this victim...

Annie Chapman was described as sober by her friend Amelia Palmer. She liked rum but didn't take to drink too often. The post-mortem says there was no evidence to suggest she had had any strong drink.
My personal opinion is that if a prostitute has no addiction, he or she may very well be potentially upstanding members of society if given a chance. (Shawn Keegan wanted to get "a good job".) I'm sure if we had 17 hour work days for a pittance, many of us would be considered unemployable too.

[String]

How did he leave the scene?
If the murderer left through the front there would have been a chance of him being spotted leaving the scene as there seemed to be a number of people passing the front of the building?
Why didn't they see him? Was it just good luck?
Another alternative is he left through a back gate, anyone know if there was a back gate? Or he climbed over the back fence.
My feeling is that he left via a back gate or over the fence because he wasn't spotted and it would have been safer for him.
The fence climbing raises a few issues for me one is he would possibly be heard clambering over and another his hands would have been bloody surely even the police wouldn't have missed bloody hand/foots prints on the fence?
Another alternative is that he went into the house and stayed there but that's being mischievous.

[Howard Brown]

String:

Considering that fingerprints wouldn't be a factor in 1888, he could very well have left via the back of the yard. Good point. Not to mention that every minute would see more people in the front of the building....

You may well be right pal.

Since no blood was found anywhere other than at the area in which Chapman was killed, it makes it doubtful that her killer hopped a back fence while making his exit. I think he walked straight out the door that he had come in from. And if Dr. Phillips was accurate about his pre-4:30am estimate time of Chapman's death, then the Ripper would not have had a whole lot to worry about in terms of an abundance of human traffic.

I have always had a difficult time concluding that this guy murdered at dawn.

[Nemo]

Hi All

I have always had the belief that the most likely escape for the Ripper was over the back fence.

All the indications I have come across suggest that the rear fence could have been stepped over quite easily with no need for climbing/clambering.

[Howard Brown]

Fair point Joe...

Great to see you posting,Nemo !!

[Nemo]

Hi Howard - thanks for the welcome (I have it confirmed that the Black Pearl is a modern invention by the way - I will dedicate a thread to it)

It has always intrigued me why there was no facial mutilation on Annie - the Ripper apparently had time to carry out the task

I do not hold to the belief that facial mutilation indicates familiarity with the victim

In Eddowes' case I believe he was attempting to create an horrific countenance for the finder(s) of the body to behold - slicing the face off from nose to lip (N.B. leaving the eyes intact)

So why no facial injuries on Annie? Escalation?

[Howard Brown]

Hi Howard - thanks for the welcome (I have it confirmed that the Black Pearl is a modern invention by the way - I will dedicate a thread to it)-NEMO

Looking forward to it,amigo !!

[String]

Originally Posted by Nemo

Hi All

I have always had the belief that the most likely escape for the Ripper was over the back fence.

All the indications I have come across suggest that the rear fence could have been stepped over quite easily with no need for climbing/clambering.

Are there any photographs or even sketches of the rear of the yard?
It would be interesting to see just how high the fence was. If it was very low then there would have been a possibility he could have been seen, although he wasn't.