![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Why Was There No Money Found on Any of the Victims? | |||
| JTR searched them for money and valuables after killing them. |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| JTR attacked them as he was proffering the money, so they never actually got it. |
|
5 | 29.41% |
| JTR had prepaid them in advance, knowing that they would spend it all, but would then trust him to be good for more. |
|
0 | 0% |
| JTR had bartered with them, offering them goods such as stale bread instead of cash. |
|
0 | 0% |
| JTR was such a smooth talker that he convinced them to wait until afterwards to be paid. |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| JTR had cultivated them generously as a 'regular' client beforehand, so thay trusted him to be good for the debt. |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| JTR had promised them a grand payment if only they would go with him. |
|
3 | 17.65% |
| JTR bought them liquor beforehand. |
|
0 | 0% |
| JTR promised them a job and a better life. |
|
0 | 0% |
| There had actually been money there, but it was pocketed by the individuals who found the bodies. |
|
3 | 17.65% |
| Who said there was no money? - what about those farthings at Annie Chapman's feet? |
|
3 | 17.65% |
| Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Female of the Species
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 2,459
|
of course, I just wondered if it was illegal for people to carry some kind of weapon back in the LVP...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Twit
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Twit Town
Posts: 1,243
|
They surely had no money?
MOst of them were out whoring because they were skint (its a matter of known fact). I presume money would have transferred hands after the act, and assuming they were killed whilst getting ready to do th edeed......its not surprising there was no money on them. p
__________________
"Chance hasn't yet peached on Jack the Ripper.If she ever does, it will probably be cause for grotesque disappointment among the Ripperologists, who get as much joy from attacking one another's lunacies, as from any problems originally posed by the Whitechapel murderer" R. Gowers, The Independant, Saturday, 31 December 1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Proprietor & Researcher
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eagleville, Pennsylvania
Posts: 39,389
|
Bell:
I am not sure if carrying scissors was an "offense"...and not really certain if a being in possession of a knife (obviously we are referring to a concealed knife..) would be considered illegal...in the UK. Maybe someone else knows...I should...but don't offhand.
__________________
Individuals wishing to join JTRForums.Com should contact me at : Donston1888@aol.com Quick link to the Complete A to Z on Amazon below Search function in operation. http://www.amazon.com/reader/1844547...der_1844547973 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Female of the Species
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 2,459
|
Thanks How...
![]() You're welcome Bell. Hopefully someone does know...and will let us both know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Didsmeister
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,064
|
Would be now How!!!!! Gawd you can't leave the house heading for the airport even thinking about scissors!!!!!!!!!
Just checked and haven't found any ref to a scissor related unpleasantness.............in the LVP, (There's an unpeakable tin-opener related total horror in WW2 but that another seriously horrible story) Mind you in Dial M for Murder- Hitchcock- the scissors were the offending item wielded by Grace Kelly....IF JTR had had a pair about his person....they wouldn't have come from his sewing kit I fancy!!! In the LVP tho -Scissors were quite an unusual and prized article a bit like tweezers,nail files etc etc..A semi sharpened knife would have done for most of those bits and pieces- as if they actually bothered most of the time. The posh (!) bits that Kate had on her person IMO didnt belong to her in the first place or she'd 'acquired' them along the way! Certainly NOT that red leather number!! Like you'd pick up half a pair of specs....mind you I would if I lost mine!!..Blooming 'eck!!!!....... half a one's better than none!!! Pass the eye!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
'Faster Pussycat, kill, kill!' - Russ Meyer
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Female of the Species
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 2,459
|
but what about knives or needles..as in sewing type needles, anything like that classed as a weapon?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,481
|
I had read somewhere that many women, and I would certainly suppose the prossies, carried hatpins as makeshift weapons during this time. Few today have seen hatpins, for they went out with low prices, but they were fearsome objects. From Wikipedia:
A hatpin is a decorative pin for holding a hat to the head, usually by the hair. In Western culture, a hatpin is almost solely a female item and is often worn in a pair. They are typically around 20cm in length, with the pinhead being the most decorated part. The hatpin was invented to hold wimples and veils in place, and was hand-made. In Britain, demand eventually outgrew the number that could be supplied by hand-making, and they began to be imported from France. In 1832, an American machine was invented to manufacture the pins, and they became much more affordable. In Britain, they rose to popularity towards the end of the Victorian era, and continue to be a popular accessory. Laws were passed in 1908 in America which limited the length of hatpins, as there was a concern they might be used by suffragettes as weapons. This one is 8" long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Female of the Species
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 2,459
|
Precisely what I mean, thanks Admin...you could do serious damage with that pretty thing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,481
|
Quote:
You may be right; I have searched diligently for more information on these 'transactions' and have come up dry. I know today one has to pay up front (thanks to Howard for that bit), but I wonder why one would not have had to do so in the East End circa 1888. What would stop a client from just walking off afterwards w/o paying the woman? Anyway, that's where the recent links posted on Victorian prostitution have come from - my trying to find an answer. Does anyone have a definitive answer here? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Former Member
Posts: n/a
|
I've sometimes entertained the idea that Jack asked Dark Annie to empty her own pockets (as part of a feigned mugging, perhaps), taking her by surprise as she - herself - bent down to line up another item by her feet.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FORENSICS OF SACRIFICE- D.Perlmutter,PhD... | Howard Brown | True Crime URL's | 2 | 05-11-2004 10:57 AM |
| The Pick-up Schtick | WTM | Random Victims or Not? | 3 | 11-03-2003 05:40 PM |