1. It went to a private citizen who was hunting for the Ripper.
2. It was sent to a prominent private citizen who was leading the "street hunt" for the Ripper.
3. It came AFTER the incident with Ms.Marsh the day before in her pop's shop.
4. It didn't just boast of future deeds....it may have provided the end result of a committed deed.
5. It made an enormous buzz within the police department...not to mention the press.
6. It may have been a faked act,which would certainly led to the culprit's imprisonment.
7. It might have been the actual kidney...despite the consensus of many people now.
So....did the kidney "make the letter" or did the letter have enough meat in it to make its bones ?
I believe Tom Wescott and Chris George felt the letter was worthy of investigation just a couple of years ago for the possible link to D'onston ( the use of the word praserved....which was also found in a (correctly spelled ) letter by Donston to the police). You never know....
2. It was sent to a prominent private citizen who was leading the "street hunt" for the Ripper.
3. It came AFTER the incident with Ms.Marsh the day before in her pop's shop.
4. It didn't just boast of future deeds....it may have provided the end result of a committed deed.
5. It made an enormous buzz within the police department...not to mention the press.
6. It may have been a faked act,which would certainly led to the culprit's imprisonment.
7. It might have been the actual kidney...despite the consensus of many people now.
So....did the kidney "make the letter" or did the letter have enough meat in it to make its bones ?
I believe Tom Wescott and Chris George felt the letter was worthy of investigation just a couple of years ago for the possible link to D'onston ( the use of the word praserved....which was also found in a (correctly spelled ) letter by Donston to the police). You never know....
Comment