Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An Outrage in Whitechapel in 1885

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerry Dunlop View Post
    Nice job, Gary. I sent you a PM. Thanks for this.
    Yes, there’s a lot to get your teeth into in this case.

    The Lipski aspect would have passed me by if you hadn’t picked up on it. Thank you for that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry Dunlop
    replied
    Nice job, Gary. I sent you a PM. Thanks for this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    I think it’s the most detailed account of the incident I’ve come across. It’s not on FindMyPast/British Newspaper Archive, I found it here:

    https://newspapers.library.wales/

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Ditto to that....Good find, Gary...

    Leave a comment:


  • Dusty Miller
    replied
    Good stuff! I hadn't seen these before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    South Wales Echo 3.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	296B9D9F-42F2-4BDA-BE67-F5CA126853A1.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	237.0 KB
ID:	561242

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    South Wales Echo 2.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A9324BA2-3FC1-44ED-BF1D-B134E3A6FB18.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	196.8 KB
ID:	561241

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    South Wales Echo (31/10/1885) 1.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	22112746-9754-41ED-8BBF-38C69CA37C17.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	195.8 KB
ID:	561240

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    Three days after the attack, Keavy approached Simon Geller, the girl’s previous landlord, and offered £3 to ‘square’ the girl. She refused, insisting on £10. The £10 was duly given to her by a man named ‘Scott’, who was clearly one of the attackers as he implored her, ‘Don’t bring me to prison.’

    Nevertheless, Marks Rubenstein took Sarah to the Thames Court and applied for a warrant on her behalf. This was granted, the magistrate instructing Rubenstein to keep the girl at his residence.

    Simon Geller was initially coerced by Keavy’s associates into lying to the defence counsel, and as a consequence he was supoenaed as a defence witness. However, when he appeared in court he changed his story.

    Dr Swyer appeared to present his medical evidence and he also revealed what Mary Keavy has told him, which apparently corroborated the victim’s account.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    It’s curious that not only was Sarah Schwartz taken to see Dr Swyer, but Mary Keavy also visited him and apparently described the attack in detail, through an interpreter. Having gone through a form of marriage with a Jewish woman whose husband turned out to be still alive (surprise?), perhaps Swyer was trusted by some in the local Jewish community.

    As I say, although the newspapers were reluctant to describe the girl’s injuries in detail, its obvious the attack was of a similar nature to that on Emma Smith. The attack was described as an ‘outrage’; the men acted in a ‘shocking’ way towards the girl; a stick was used ‘in the manner described’; and Swyer found recent bloodstains on her underclothing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    Originally posted by Dusty Miller View Post
    I remember coming across these reports many years ago when I was searching for Israel Schwartz.

    The three day trial got quite a bit of coverage across the country. The Pall Mall Gazette even suggesting the Home Secretary should look into the case. A familiar name in D.S. Enright was involved in the case.
    Yes, I was searching for info on Dr Swyer when I lighted on this affair. I think the assault took place in Backchurch Lane, which is a fair distance from Brick Lane. I wonder why Swyer was chosen?

    There are those who parcel up Smith and Tabram with the C5 because of the similarity of the attacks - wounds, locations, victims etc. I think that’s unwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dusty Miller
    replied
    I remember coming across these reports many years ago when I was searching for Israel Schwartz.

    The three day trial got quite a bit of coverage across the country. The Pall Mall Gazette even suggesting the Home Secretary should look into the case. A familiar name in D.S. Enright was involved in the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    Originally posted by Gary Barnett View Post
    I can’t find anything else against them. Lewis/Louis was found guilty of indecent assault and received 18 months’ hard labour. Dr Swyer also at one time attended a woman whose husband had cut her throat. Although such extreme violence was fortunately rare, it did happen.
    Nina beat me to it.

    Yes, it beggars belief that such a disgusting crime should be so lightly punished.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gary Barnett
    replied
    Originally posted by Howard Brown View Post
    Excellent find, Gary.....

    I wonder if this is the first instance of these two being involved with this sort of bestial behavior.
    I can’t find anything else against them. Lewis/Louis was found guilty of indecent assault and received 18 months’ hard labour. Dr Swyer also at one time attended a woman whose husband had cut her throat. Although such extreme violence was fortunately rare, it did happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Nina checked the criminal register and they received sentences of 18 months each.

    Another flimsy sentence for violence to women.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X