Well, the original article said 'little more than a year ago'
But surely this information is only relevant to the date that the list was first started, not the date of the latest addition, and this particular 'fact' would of course never be updated - That's how the error crept in.
I've been looking at the whole Fairy Fay business, and as usual I've got a different explanation than everyone else!
But surely this information is only relevant to the date that the list was first started, not the date of the latest addition, and this particular 'fact' would of course never be updated - That's how the error crept in.
I've been looking at the whole Fairy Fay business, and as usual I've got a different explanation than everyone else!
Comment