I’ve no issue with the points that you’ve made Ed, but I personally don’t see this as even putting a dent in Druitt as a candidate but some will disagree with this view of course and that’s fair enough. From my own point of view there could have been any number of reasons why he chose to return to London after the first game that are simply unknown to us. As I mentioned in an earlier post, perhaps he didn’t initially intend to return to play in the second game but plans were changed for whatever reason? On the last part though (emboldened) I’d point you in the direction of Casebook where, for a minority of posters, any mention of Druitt has them close to foaming at the mouth. Then again, you’d correctly point out how some get angry at the suggestion that a certain carman might have been the ripper.
Its all down to individual interpretation and assessment of course and as you say, the killer blow could be found at any time for any suspect. Or just a discovery that make them more or less likely. It shouldn’t be the end of the world if a suspect can be crossed of the overlong list.
All of that said, thanks go to Joanna for bringing this to our attention.

Its all down to individual interpretation and assessment of course and as you say, the killer blow could be found at any time for any suspect. Or just a discovery that make them more or less likely. It shouldn’t be the end of the world if a suspect can be crossed of the overlong list.
All of that said, thanks go to Joanna for bringing this to our attention.
Comment