Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who do you think was JtR's last murder poll

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who do you think was JtR's last murder poll

    The named (first nine) are listed in order of occurrence. So who do you think?
    74
    Catherine Eddowes
    5.41%
    4
    Whitehall Mystery
    0.00%
    0
    Mary Jane Kelly
    48.65%
    36
    Rose Mylett
    1.35%
    1
    Elizabeth Jackson
    0.00%
    0
    Alice McKenzie
    18.92%
    14
    Pinchin Street Torso
    0.00%
    0
    Frances Coles
    13.51%
    10
    Carrie Brown
    1.35%
    1
    Another Please Explain
    10.81%
    8

  • #2
    Regarding the final option, that could be another victim affiliated with the case like Frances Hancock (November 1888) or John Gill (December 1888) as well as suspect connected victims like Phoebe Hogg (October 1890) and Emily Dimmock (September 1907). It could also be a named victim as yet unconnected to the case or someone completely unknown to us at present.

    Comment


    • #3
      I guess if you think Druitt was the Ripper then the last victim would have been himself.

      Comment


      • #4
        Ah, a four way tie for first place.

        Comment


        • #5
          If Alice MacKenzie was a Ripper victim he was slumming by then, not up to his old form. I don't believe she was one of his victims.

          Chris
          Christopher T. George, Lyricist & Co-Author, "Jack the Musical"
          https://www.facebook.com/JackTheMusical/ Hear sample song at https://tinyurl.com/y8h4envx.

          Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conferences, April 2016 and 2018.
          Hear RipperCon 2016 & 2018 talks at http://www.casebook.org/podcast/.

          Comment


          • #6
            I understand your point Chris but I think McKenzie is more like Nichols than Tabram, the other "Bracket Murder", is and she's one many want to add to the tally. The main argument against her would likely be the de-escalation but that is explained by the possible interruption of the process as with Stride. Actually, I'm pretty evenly torn between Eddowes, Kelly and McKenzie.

            Comment


            • #7
              I can't see anyone being 100% sure no matter what their choice.

              Comment


              • #8
                It doesn't look like Glenn has voted.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think it was MJK...you couldnt 'kill someone anymore that that' and so couldnt kill again after; I think if they werent caught, or went mad, or killed themselves, they left London sharply after killing MJK...I just dont think those other women were the victims of JTR cause he would have left town.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I dunno about that Currer, look at Danny Wotsisface - the Gainsfield ripper, he kept coming back for more.
                    Tel
                    Lacerta es reptiles quisnam mos non exsisto accuso nusquam

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Never heard of him...did he do it in the same place though or move around the country?? What year was this?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Would that be Danny Rolling, the Gainesville Ripper?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          WHAT?! No Johnnie Gill?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Stan Reid View Post
                            Regarding the final option, that could be another victim affiliated with the case like Frances Hancock (November 1888) or John Gill (December 1888) as well as suspect connected victims like Phoebe Hogg (October 1890) and Emily Dimmock (September 1907). It could also be a named victim as yet unconnected to the case or someone completely unknown to us at present.
                            Hi Tim,

                            I did mention him here - just ran out of room.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by admin View Post
                              WHAT?! No Johnnie Gill?
                              The more I read about the Gill case the more I think he is a serious candidate for admission to the Canon.

                              That chapter in The Strange World of the Brontes makes interesting reading. (Campell fingers Maybrick as the culprit BTW, for added bonus points.)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X