Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Emily Nowell - 1884 Prostitute Murder

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Great job, Howard. Thanks.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Tom, Debs...
    That's about all she wrote in Gale.

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Glasgow Herald
    January 22, 1884
    *************



    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied

    Morning Post

    January 19, 1884
    **************

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Birmingham Daily Post
    January 19, 1884
    **************

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Thanks, Howard.

    Hi Debs. What do you want to bet it was the reward that made that woman tell on Crispin. As for the hospital records, I just meant the nearest hospital and infirmary from the area where Emily worked.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra Arif
    replied
    No, I hadn't seen this case before,Tom.
    Crispin was never a serious suspect,he was discharged by magistrates as there was no evidence against him at all apart from some gossip from a woman he'd had a conversation with about the case.
    The problem with looking at hospital records is that we know where the crime occurred but not where the perpetrator lived. There were quite a few Infirmaries (where someone might go if they couldn't work) and hospitals in London and the records are un-indexed..

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Tom:
    I agree that there might be some gold in them thar hospital records....that's good thinking.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Hi Howard. Even tough handed guys have bony knuckles, and with the damage that Emily received, his hands would be bloodied and swollen, if not broken, regardless of his line of work. The reason I brought up his line of work is that even if he could withstand the pain of his injuries, an inability to earn income might have forced him to seek medical care.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Tom:
    If the killer wasn't in a line of work where the condition of his hands ( toughness and durability ) weren't important, it would be easier to believe his hands were damaged from a fatal assbeating....not to discourage you. A clerk, pencil pusher, or worthless intellectual would be very likely to damage his mitts...not a man like me, for instance, whose hands are like steel ingots.
    I think it would be a good thing to check into hospital records just the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by Debra Arif View Post
    There was also a sailor named Crispin who came under suspicion but there was absolutley no evidence against him and the case was discharged.
    I don't remember this case being mentioned in lists of unsolved cases before -could someone have been convicted years later?
    Hi Debs. So you've heard of this case before? I only read a couple of the articles, so I don't recall Crispin. Actually, I was searching 'Georgina Smith' to see if Gorgeianna had made the press under that name, and a different woman of that name was a witness in the Nowell case.

    But try to imagine beating a person to death with your fists while (or before/after) strangling them. And he had already given her money. His hand would have been sausage the next morning. Makes you wonder what kind of work he was in, because most men in that area needed their hands to work. I wonder if there's any listing for a man with a broken/damaged hand visited the infirmaries or hospitals in the week following this murder.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    This one has its own thread....

    Belfast News Letter
    January 17, 1884
    ***************

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Berrow's Worcester Journal
    January 12, 1884
    **************
    --

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra Arif
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post

    The first and only suspect in the case was Frederick James Harris, a carman, who had cohabitated with the victim for 7 weeks and had dated her for 6 months. He discovered the body. He had blood on his clothes, but this could have come from him handling the victim and washing the blood off her face.
    There was also a sailor named Crispin who came under suspicion but there was absolutley no evidence against him and the case was discharged.
    I don't remember this case being mentioned in lists of unsolved cases before -could someone have been convicted years later?

    Leave a comment:


  • Howard Brown
    replied
    Tom:
    When I get home today, I'll post all the ones I can find, if that's what you wanted.
    Looking into the Illustrated Police News, its surprising to find nothing on this case, considering its right up the IPN's alley.
    The murder, as you know, occurred on December 30th, 1883...

    Here's our publishin' pals at the PIP ( Penny Illustrated Paper ) for a threadstarter....more to follow this afternoon.

    Penny Illustrated Paper
    January 12, 1884
    **************

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X