Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kelly's real landlord - Abraham Barnett 1833-1918

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Chris Scott
    I have often wondered if the Jewish name Barnett was a rendering of a Jewish name such as Bernstein etc.
    Hello Chris

    "Barnet/Barnet" are, along with "Benedict", common anglicisations of the Jewish name "Baruch".
    Kind regards, Sam Flynn

    "Suche Nullen"
    (F. Nietzsche)

    Comment


    • #17
      It appears that Barnett did not have a good business track record. The bankruptcy notice I posted at post #8 was not his first.
      The clipping below is from the London Gazette from 8 March 1864
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Sam Flynn
        Hello Chris

        "Barnet/Barnet" are, along with "Benedict", common anglicisations of the Jewish name "Baruch".
        Hello Gareth,

        Thanks for this... I was wondering about why someone would "translate" their Jewish name to an English variant.. especially when, as you point out, the variant is already in place (as above) and not connected to the last name of the Jewish person in question, in this case. Is there a "Baruch" in the family Chris? Perhaps I missed something? (probably!)



        Phil
        from 1905...to 19.05..it was written in the stars

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Phil Carter
          Hello Gareth,

          Thanks for this... I was wondering about why someone would "translate" their Jewish name to an English variant.. especially when, as you point out, the variant is already in place (as above) and not connected to the last name of the Jewish person in question, in this case. Is there a "Baruch" in the family Chris? Perhaps I missed something? (probably!)



          Phil
          Hi Phil
          From the family tree there may have been some question as his legitimacy I would surmise. His father is named as P Bear Zweigbaum and no mother is named. This is the opposite of most illegitimate listings as it is usually the father not listed. The "Bear" is apparently the translation of the name Dov and I have seen Barnett himself listed as Abraham Dov Barnett.
          The motive for a change of name or anglicising a name would be for a variety of reasons. For example, even though the Jewish population of the East End was considerable (or maybe because it was) ant semitism was not at all unknown - consider Warren's wiping of the Goulston Street writing. So I suppose in some cases the name was changed for social or business reasons.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Chris Scott
            It appears that Barnett did not have a good business track record. The bankruptcy notice I posted at post #8 was not his first.
            The clipping below is from the London Gazette from 8 March 1864
            Similarly, the furrier Martin Kosminski, who had a business in Milk Street, Cheapside, underwent bankruptcies and appeared in court in regard to other legal scrapes over the years. Vide Christopher T. George, "The Bankruptcies of Martin Kosminski," Ripperologist No. 42, August 2002.

            Best regards

            Chris
            Christopher T. George, Lyricist & Co-Author, "Jack the Musical"
            https://www.facebook.com/JackTheMusical/ Hear sample song at https://tinyurl.com/y8h4envx.

            Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conferences, April 2016 and 2018.
            Hear RipperCon 2016 & 2018 talks at http://www.casebook.org/podcast/.

            Comment


            • #21
              Here’s a National Life Story (source for the geni.com tree) by a descendantnif Abraham Barnett.

              Comment


              • #22
                The research I've uncovered is super-complicated. It involves the butcher Henry Jacob's son Judah. His brother married a relative of Rosalie Ochse. A poster is suggesting he adopted the alias Jacques Daniel Myers, and interesting things result.



                My interest is in the fact that the parties have a lot of addresses in Paddington (see above link) near Mary Jane Kelly's landlord's home in Maida Vale - 21 Portsdown Ave which is now 21 Randolph Ave.

                Cumberland House for one is only .2 miles away. I already think they all know Rosalie but this kind of highlights the few degrees of separation.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by San Fran
                  The research I've uncovered is super-complicated. It involves the butcher Henry Jacob's son Judah. His brother married a relative of Rosalie Ochse. A poster is suggesting he adopted the alias Jacques Daniel Myers, and interesting things result.



                  My interest is in the fact that the parties have a lot of addresses in Paddington (see above link) near Mary Jane Kelly's landlord's home in Maida Vale - 21 Portsdown Ave which is now 21 Randolph Ave.

                  Cumberland House for one is only .2 miles away. I already think they all know Rosalie but this kind of highlights the few degrees of separation.
                  SF,

                  Do you imagine AB knew every person to whom McCarthy sublet a room in Dorset Street?

                  I personally doubt he ever met McCarthy, let alone the untold hundreds that washed in and out of the slum rooms they drew their income from.

                  It's a pity Chris Scott chose to use the word 'real' when he started this thread. It's meaningless.

                  Gary

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    McCarthy is already identified. I’m not following his trail in the least.

                    I’m tracing Mary Kelly through her reasonably established West End London origin. If the last landlord is practically next door to her first London “Madam”’s in-laws, (that’s what it looks like), isn’t it worth a look?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by San Fran
                      McCarthy is already identified. I’m not following his trail in the least.

                      I’m tracing Mary Kelly through her reasonably established West End London origin. If the last landlord is practically next door to her first London “Madam”’s in-laws, (that’s what it looks like), isn’t it worth a look?
                      Of course it is, SF.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I looked in Fiona Rule’s book to see if there was an explanation of the M vs A Barnett discrepancy, but couldn’t find anything.

                        By 1890 Abraham was said to have no assets. Had he sold the Dorset Street properties by then?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Gary Barnett
                          I looked in Fiona Rule’s book to see if there was an explanation of the M vs A Barnett discrepancy, but couldn’t find anything.

                          By 1890 Abraham was said to have no assets. Had he sold the Dorset Street properties by then?
                          No available assets. He had 28k of secured debt. Secured on property (real estate) presumably.

                          Was he actually receiving the rent from the pledged properties?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Gary Barnett
                            I looked in Fiona Rule’s book to see if there was an explanation of the M vs A Barnett discrepancy, but couldn’t find anything.

                            By 1890 Abraham was said to have no assets. Had he sold the Dorset Street properties by then?
                            Could M be his son Moses? He was born in 1867.

                            Isn't McCarthy supposed to have bought the properties by 1881? Lax tax records? Or some sort of arrangement?

                            My grandather had a brother called Moses, known as Uncle Mo, and this again was a bit
                            of my grandfather's intolerance of anything that didn't come up to his standards. Uncle
                            Mo was not a very successful businessman apparently; he used to batten on ...my
                            grandfather I think (Pyza). And, he, he used to batten on...he used to...any rate, he was
                            always the poor relation, Uncle Mo was. https://s3.amazonaws.com/photos.geni...0_original.pdf

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by San Fran
                              Could M be his son Moses? He was born in 1867.

                              Isn't McCarthy supposed to have bought the properties by 1881? Lax tax records? Or some sort of arrangement?
                              Not sure. They were advertised for sale in 1866, 1871 and 1884.

                              Is there any hard evidence that the M. Barnett shown in the 1889 tax record is the Maida Vale builder or his son?

                              Fiona Rule does indulge in guesswork at times. For instance, she says there is circumstantial evidence of the Dorset Street and Breezer’s hill JM’s being related and working for the same ‘firm’. She cites the fact that they were both brought up around Borough High Street as an example. Now, I was under the impression that Rose Brooks’s husband was a Whitechapel man.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                This is from the City Press of 1st December, 1866. Also being offered for sale is 149, Houndsditch.

                                C586FE83-8610-4184-839D-CF812CA53E54.jpeg

                                Perhaps Barnett tried to offload the properties in 1866, 1871 and 1884, but there were no takers?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                👍