Originally posted by Mark Kent
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The French Lady Uncovered ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by San Fran View PostI'm still trying to orient myself here. I'm not a Timelord or a LocationLord.
Irongate/St. Katharine's Wharves - The Locations Guide to Doctor Who, Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures (doctorwholocations.net)
I found sources that say that there was a problem with unaccompanied women being accosted at the Wharf/Docks and needing protection. The scenario of Mary being picked up at the Docks, or more likely a bar, or even her "turning right" as you quoted HR, still looks the best bet.
wharf.jpg
Comment
-
Originally posted by San Fran View Post
I don't see a whole lot of difference in the scenario with MJK docking at the Irongate Wharf or the St. Katharine's Wharf (now Pier?).
I found sources that say that there was a problem with unaccompanied women being accosted at the Wharf/Docks and needing protection. The scenario of Mary being picked up at the Docks, or more likely a bar, or even her "turning right" as you quoted HR, still looks the best bet.
wharf.jpg
There were two pubs on the wharves, though.
Comment
-
I found the quote about unaccompanied immigrant and non-immigrant women falling prey to the "sharks" at the dock.
...allusion should also be made to a species of infamy which, I am credibly informed, has been carried on for some time past at the London Docks. Many of the immigrants are young women, Jewesses of considerable personal attractions. Men-sharks, and female harpies of all descriptions, are on the look-out for them as soon as they disembark. The young women are approached, and asked in "Yiddish" whether they are in want of work. The answer of course is in the affirmative, especially as many of these young Jewesses arrive in a friendless condition. "Then," comes the suggestion, "you had better come and stay with me until you get it," or "I can put you in the way of obtaining it." Of course this dodge does not always succeed...But in two cases out of three it does. The girl, friendless and unprotected, goes off with her interlocutor, and then the old shameful story is repeated. She stays in the house until the little she has is more than due for board; her efforts to earn an honest living are in vain; and when she is destitute, she is told she must either leave the place, minus even her little baggage, or earn money at the expense of her virtue. Such a dilemma, in nine cases out of ten, presents only one means of escape; and the girl goes to swell the number of the lost and degraded of our great cities. One of the worst features of this system is, that the decoy is largely carried on by Englishmen and Englishwomen, and by no means confined to foreigners alone.
Comment
-
Of course, the above scenario doesn't make sense happening to a woman who had just been decoyed and duped by Eugenie Roullier. She wouldn't fall for that again. That's another reason for me to go with Mary being a semi-willing accomplice to the procuress, who lost her semi-willingness but would still continue the life.
She wouldn’t have been at the Docks. She would have arrived at one of the wharves - Irongate or St Katherine. From there she would have exited into Little Tower Hill which was lined with cabs. If she eschewed the cab option and walked all the way to the top of Little Tower Hill, a right hand turn would have presented itself - Upper East Smithfield which had blank dock walls along its southern side as far as the eye could see.
The question then arises for me as to whether someone like the Morgenstern brothers would be on the docks on the lookout for girls. Presumably he had girls and he or they would be on the lookout for sailors. They wouldn't be at the passenger steamer docks or the local pubs there unless they were looking for girls to prey on.
A desperate Mary might go with one of the Morgensterns or a Maywood, even if she had no illusions about the place she was going to.
Comment
-
I think it's fair to assume that, with Morgenstern and wife taking Mary Kelly in, that they had a room to spare so, with a steamer from France coming in, I think it's also fair to assume that Morgenstern or Boekee were among those waiting to see who comes off the ship and offering accommodations and work to any unaccompanied woman.
Comment
-
I will have to say, after all this time of Ripper research, that this is the most likely chain of Mary's progress in London from the West End to Pennington in the East, from the information we have been given. Unless someone can come up with a better alternative or better modify this one, this is it:
Rosalie and Charles Ochse to Walter Sickert to Eugenie Roullier and Captain Verney to the Steamer from France to Morgenstern and Boekee
Comment
-
Originally posted by San Fran View PostI will have to say, after all this time of Ripper research, that this is the most likely chain of Mary's progress in London from the West End to Pennington in the East, from the information we have been given. Unless someone can come up with a better alternative or better modify this one, this is it:
Rosalie and Charles Ochse to Walter Sickert to Eugenie Roullier and Captain Verney to the Steamer from France to Morgenstern and Boekee
As for the steamer route, to/from Irongate/St Katherine, that’s possible, but there were other routes to and from the continent. What I find unlikely is that Kelly turned up at St Katherines and somehow made her way to Pennington Street by accident or even by being procured there by a placeur (or whatever the correct term is).
As for all the other stuff, I’m sorry but when a name such as Sickert pops up, I switch off.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gary Barnett View PostAs for the steamer route, to/from Irongate/St Katherine, that’s possible, but there were other routes to and from the continent. What I find unlikely is that Kelly turned up at St Katherines and somehow made her way to Pennington Street by accident or even by being procured there by a placeur (or whatever the correct term is).
Would the brothel keepers even wait around for one or be on paid-standby to accept any castoffs, when the "pickings" were so good on the Wharf or Dock? They're lodgings weren't especially spacious.
The box (valise of dresses) story suggests she got separated from it. I would suggest it was through long-distance travel. If she was sent away from a West End brothel, then why would they send her away without her valise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wicker Man View Post
Hi Anna.
I like to keep a handful of links to 19th century dictionaries (from the 1820's onward), we notice that occasionally the meaning of words do change. We need to know what the usage was at the time.
There did appear to be a distinction between Milliner and Milaner, the former signifying a worker in hats, typically female, the latter a trader in goods from Milan.
Not the same word.
Here we read:
Milliner, a maker of ladies hats, bonnets, etc.
Milaner, a dealer in goods made in, or brought from, Milan.
1911.
https://archive.org/details/moderndi...p?view=theater
(p.430.)
Again:
Milliner, a Person (usu. woman) who makes up bonnets and other female apparel.
Milaner, vender of Milan goods.
1919.
https://archive.org/details/con00cis...p?view=theater
(p.516)
In that latter case, Milliner, when applied to a man, means: "..one busied in trifling occupations". Like a slap in the face for women's work
Ya gotta laugh!The wickedness of the world is the dream of the plague.~~Voynich Manuscript
Comment
-
In that latter case, Milliner, when applied to a man, means: "..one busied in trifling occupations". Like a slap in the face for women's work
Ya gotta laugh!
In which case, the report of Mary working in a "shoddy shop" could actually mean that she worked in a "fancy goods" shop.
Comment
-
Shoddy cloth, invented in the mid 19th century was made from waste wool and was used for the making of clothes, shoddy being cheaper to make would allow clothes to be sold cheaper than those made from new wool. Perhaps the term "shoddy shop" could mean a cheap clothing shop?
A little more detail here:
https://www.historyextra.com/period/...e-word-shoddy/
Rgds
John
Comment
-
The article says "statements have appeared". That sounds like written statements. Could that be evidence that Mrs. Phoenix, in her statement to the police, did make those statements about Buki and Mary and the French Lady in the West End?
Madam Roullier didn't live in a "fashionable" house of resorts. But I don't doubt that Madam Ochse did. Or else, how did she become a minor celebrity that was lampooned in the papers?!
Comment
Comment