Originally posted by Debra Arif
View Post
I originally found the picture in files deposited at the National Archives by the Stationers Company, after I became interested in Sutcliffe's work. The Stationers Company files contain hundreds of thousands of copies of photographs sent in when a photographer wished to register that photograph for copyright.
The picture I posted was sent in by Frank Meadow Sutcliffe and the address of his studio in Whitby is given. The copyright was applied for in 1896.
Sutcliffe had applied for copyright on many of his photographs during the late Victorian period, one other being the famous picture depicting naked boy bathers. That photograph was taken in 1886 and also registered the same year. That got me wondering why a photograph of "Polly Swallow" taken in 1889 would be registered in 1896 and why was it described in the copyright files very oddly as a--"Photograph of girl with net over her shoulder wearing a plaided shawl. Dress waist open showing stays." with no mention of a name or date. I can't see this copyright application (or any of his others) mentioned in the Sutcliffe Gallery or Whitby museum write ups either.
I wonder why no one had ever commented before on the fact that Polly was basically showing off her underwear in the pictures? It isn't obvious to us today and if it hadn't have been for the description I wouldn't have known but at the time the photographs were published wouldn't that have seemed a little 'indecent' to be posing like that?
I tried to do a bit of background research into Polly Swallow and can't for the life of me find any girl named Swallow in Whitby who could be Polly. The name Swallow was not very common in the area, although there are a couple of families with the name, none who I can see ever lived on Church St though. I'll keep plugging at it as I find it quite an interesting little mystery but if anyone has any ideas or knows anything more, I'd love some more info!
Comment