Sending you my best Simon
Monty
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Search Result
Collapse
500 results in 0.2033 seconds.
Keywords
Members
Tags
-
Shall look forward to your views on John Bennett’s intro.
That is sad to note.
Monty....
Leave a comment:
-
-
From a legal perspective, who Keith Stride is, is irrelevant. From curiosity, my money is on Barry Eddowes or Billy Kelly.
Monty...
Leave a comment:
-
Whilst acknowledging your innocent ignorance RJ, and with respect, this isn’t mere Ripperological infighting.
We are talking out and out plagiarism.
Monty...
Leave a comment:
-
According to to Cobb, Keith Stride is female and shall be revealed on Friday.
It’s all rather exciting isn’t it? 🙄
Monty
Leave a comment:
-
Who are responsible for their own individual entries.
Monty...
Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Who is tarring those authors? I only see Ricky and Keith’s names associated with plagiarism.
However, I will state, given Cobbs low reputation it does make one wonder why these authors would associate themselves with him. Therefore it’s natural to question given the fact plagiarism...
Leave a comment:
-
No matter what your views are about any of the individuals concerned, plagiarism is obviously wrong and damaging, and once published, becomes a readership/public concern.
There is an onus of responsibility on the author to ensure the work is true. Clearly this aspect has been disregarded,...
Leave a comment:
-
Very much. Is there a link?
As I mentioned to you privately, SY had specialist teams which focused on specific crimes such as banking fraud, extortion etc. I suspect this surveillance team would use men from different division who had a bent for such work, with the reason they wouldn’t...
Leave a comment:
-
It’s not a term I’m familiar with Debs.
I suspect they may be akin to the teams who would be drafted out to rural major crimes (think of Road Hill House and Whicher) however these were purely investigative teams as opposed to surveillance teams.
Flying Brigades or...
Leave a comment:
-
Apparently Dan Norder said in an old Casebook post that he inquired about the kidney at the London Hospital Archives and was told it was destroyed, possibly in the 1970s. He even posted a photo of himself with the archivist at the time. I'll see if I can locate the thread but it might have been lost...
Leave a comment:
-
Sure it was the kidney Justin, and not Leonard Archers (Lusks Grandson) 1966 letter?
Monty
...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: