Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Search Result
Collapse
500 results in 0.2196 seconds.
Keywords
Members
Tags
-
This is very significant. Well done, Joanna!
-
-
I think Bob would have been well please with How and Nina as the first annual choice.. He respected the effort it took to keep this site going and the family atmosphere that was promoted and maintained while showcasing outstanding research and discussion. Congratulations Nina and what's his name........
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
The fact that this has even been a debate over all this time only highlights how gullible human beings can be.
Leave a comment:
-
Ditto to what Gary said. It's not just the discussion, which others have, but the ever expanding research that has added to an immense repository that is unmatched in this field.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for your post, Matthias. You touched a lot of buttons there. I believe that your opinions probably represent the majority who have studied this case. Of all the 'clues' left during the murders, the obviously deliberate extraction of Catherine Eddowes' kidney, considering the apparent haphazard...
Leave a comment:
-
Just read through this thread. Love all of you as family. Best discussion forums I've ever been a part of. You're the best, How. And I will be forever grateful.
Leave a comment:
-
-
-
-
Thanks How. I had never heard of this Kentucky woman but it has piqued my interest.
Leave a comment:
-
May be just a case of the killer being of or near the same social class as his victims.
Leave a comment:
-
The timing on Chapman's death, more than what she may have been doing, has been most problematic to me.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: