500 results in 0.1359 seconds.
-
The Times, Saturday August 11th 1888 -
...Leave a comment:
-
This may help.
...Leave a comment:
-
Hi Michael,
Kindly explain how this gets MJD to London in time for the incident at 3.45 am on 31st August 1888.
Regards,
SimonLeave a comment:
-
Hi All,
Now we've more or less satisfied ourselves that Druitt was innocent, perhaps the time has come to turn our attention to the other end of the question.
Macnaghten's interest was triggered by the Sun's six-part story, the first part of which appeared on Tuesday 13th February...Leave a comment:
-
Whatever, Herlock.Leave a comment:
-
Hi Michael,
"I'm happy with my position on the subject of Macnaghten and Druitt."
“I’ve decided what happened therefore it must be true.”
"It’s ego on stilts."
Nice going, Herlock.
Regards,
SimonLeave a comment:
-
Hi Caz,
Perhaps by using the name and suicide details of Druitt, but contriving to get his age and profession wrong, Macnaghten was actually disguising the identity of his real suspect.
Merely a passing thought.
Regards,
SimonLeave a comment:
-
Hi Michael,
I don't know if you have ever been a scriptwriter, but the post you have just laid before us reads like part of a round-table conference in which a team of writers suggest scenarios to account for a gaping hole in the plot.
Regards,
SimonLeave a comment:
-
As people "more likely than Cutbush" to have been the Ripper, Macnaghten chose a dead man and someone incarcerated in a mental asylum. And just to prove how inept he was at framing innocent people, Macnaghten threw in a Russian doctor who, six months after his memorandum was written, was paid...Leave a comment:
-
Hi Michael,
You've obviously tried to over-think this.
As I said in my post -
You need help.
Regards,
SimonLeave a comment:
-
And to think, Druitt would have to have been aware of all the train times, the early closing, the possibility of the cricket match going on too long and scuppering his plans, thinking up a reason to explain his sudden dash to London, the logistics of dumping his cricket attire in a place and manner...Leave a comment:
-
Hansard, Wednesday 4th March 1903—
Mr. Price [Norfolk E]—
It would be in the recollection of hon. Members that in the year 1888 a Bill dealing with the early closing of shops was introduced by Lord Avebury, then Sir John Lubbock, and was rejected by a very large majority.Leave a comment:
-
Hi Michael.
I can't believe you wrote these last two posts with a straight face.
If you did, then it's time you got a grip.
Take care.
Simon...Leave a comment:
-
Hi Michael,
I'm not angry, just mildly intrigued that so many people buy into Macnaghten's memorandum and the lengths to which they are willing to go to defend his honour.
Cricket matches either side of a murder date—even a cricket match on a murder date—yet still the believers...Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: